[ RadSafe ] Maynard's 1953 uranium studies
Steven Dapra
sjd at swcp.com
Sat Jun 14 19:52:31 CDT 2008
June 14
During the recent battle here over the purported dangers of depleted
uranium (DU), James Salsman (JS) repeatedly invoked some work done by
Elliott Maynard in 1953, and claimed that Maynard's findings supported JS's
claims about the dangers of DU in particular, and of uranium in
general. During the battle I may have said that Maynard's work was not
available in the local university library, however I have discovered that
it is available, and I have made a cursory examination of the work of
Maynard and his co-workers.
Their studies were done on rats, and used uranyl nitrate hexahydrate. JS
frequently invoked JL Domingo's work on DU to support his
claims. Domingo's work was done on mice, and used uranyl acetate
dihydrate. (I am not a uranium chemist, and hence I can't comment on any
possible differences in the health effects of these two types of uranium.)
One of James Salsman's chief claims was that DU is teratogenic, and it
appears that this is the case --- at least in laboratory rats and
mice. Maynard's work did not address teratogenicity. It was concerned
with growth rates of exposed animals, their weights, and the weights of
their various organs; all with respect to the levels of exposure to uranyl
nitrate hexahydrate. In light of this, I would say that Maynard's work has
no application to the question of teratogenicity. This is not to denigrate
Maynard's work. It merely is not applicable to teratogenicity.
Steven Dapra
Note:
Maynard's work will be found in Pharmacology and Toxicology of Uranium
Compounds, Carl Voegtlin and Harold Hodge editors; McGraw-Hill, 1953; first
edition. It is in Part 3 of this edition, Chapter 20, which begins on p.
1221.
More information about the RadSafe
mailing list