[ RadSafe ] [DU-WATCH] Re:U-238 spontaneous fission= birth defects, cancers
peter.bossew at jrc.it
Wed Jun 18 03:09:16 CDT 2008
The SF branching ratio of 238U is 5.45e-5% (Lund catalogue:
and others), thus the recommended SF decay half life is 8.202 +- 0.060
e15 y. (discussion of data in
The Lund catalogue also quotes a bb decay, branching ratio 2.2e-10%.
Roger Helbig wrote:
> Elaine Hunter and Cathy Garger's latest speculation - now, they are
> concerned that spontaneous fission is the cause of the birth defects - I
> appreciated being advised by a sharp eyed RASAFer that the British Medical
> Journal published one of the so-called DU victims with an unknown skin
> disease and received a number of electronic replies telling that it was not
> unkown and naming it.
> Roger Helbig
> --- On *Tue, 6/17/08, Cathy Garger <savorsuccesslady3 at yahoo.com>* wrote:
> Dear Elaine,
> This is superb - thank you! I would like to encourage you to consider
> publishing this in article form!
> Cathy Garger
> From: Elaine Hunter <dutnkyoh at yahoo.com>
> Subject: [DU-WATCH] U-238 spontaneous fission= birth defects, cancers
> To: du-watch at yahoogroups.com, "du-list" <du-list at yahoogroups.com>
> Date: Tuesday, June 17, 2008, 6:50 AM
> Look for the spontaneous fission products of U-238 to find an important cause of
> increased rates of birth defects in Iraq [and other places] and the cause of,
> for example the virulent, aggressive and deadly cancers of deceased veteran
> Dustin Brim and others.
> Whoever claims that there are no fission products associated with the use of
> concentrated "depleted" uranium has just plain not done their homework.
> I've read such claims. They are WRONG.
> The case for fission products when DU munitions are used, especially
> aerosolized, is exactly the same as the case for neuton emissions [and really
> I'd hoped someone else would notice and write an email about it]. We must
> get beyond alpha and consider the whole radioactive/toxic alphabet soup when DU
> munitions are used if we are to fully profile this insidious, surreptitious
> serial killer.
> Here it is again:
> THE CASE FOR FISSION PRODUCTS FROM CONCENTRATED "DEPLETED" URANIUM [you
> don't have to be a nuclear physicist, just have some reading comprehension]
> 1. Rate of Spontaneous Fission Neutrons From Uranium is 59.5 neutrons/g/hr
> [According to one reference [ iop.org/EJ/abstract/0370-1298/65/3/307 from Proc.
> Phys. Soc., D.J. Littler, 1952: "A Determination of the Rate of Emission of
> Spontaneous Fission Neutrons in Natural Uranium"] the rate of emission of
> spontaneous fission neutrons from natural uranium is computed to be 59.5
> neutrons/g/hr of uranium.]
> 2. Uranium-238 Undergoes Spontaneous Fission at a Rate 35X That of Uranium-235
> [According to another reference:
> ], Uranium-238 undergoes
> spontaneous fission at a rate 35 times that of Uranium-235.]
> Though U-238 is not fissile, which means it does not sustain chain
> reactions, it is indeed fissionable, spontaneously fissionable.
> Now, if natural uranium [U238 + U235, +U234] undergoes spontaneous fission at a
> certain rate, and U238 undergoes spontaneous fission at a higher rate than U235
> here's what happens:
> Concentrated "depleted" uranium has had most of the U235 and U234
> removed from the mix; gaseous diffusion sends the lighter isotopes and heavier
> ones to two different streams in the process. [The Revenooers don't mind this
> kind of still, they get their piece of the pie and if they ain't no moonshine
> still within a couple of miles of home… but I digress]. Anyway, the result
> is that the spontaneous fission rate of what we call DU will not be less than
> natural uranium. A tiny bit more, in fact, but I'll spare you the math on
> Also, I'll spare you the math on how many tons of the stuff was used--still
> under debate-- and go with the imprecise "a whoppin' lot." So there's
> MUST be fission products. On Wikipedia one can find listing of fission
> products for U-235. Those from U-238 are probably similar. Some have long
> half-lives, some short. ALL are radioactive. Don't fool yourselves, given
> the opportunity the ones with short half-lives will do the most damage to
> health because of rapid rates of radiative decay.
> Here's an unknown consideration at least for me. When a vehicle is
> incinerated there is an intense thermodynamic event. I do wonder if the
> extremely high temperatures increase the rates of fission product emissions.
> In addition, the neutrons released will transmute some of the materials
> involved into radioactive isotopes.
> Really the scenario is extremely complex. Mind boggling.
> Elaine Hunter
> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at: http://radlab.nl/radsafe/radsaferules.html
> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit: http://radlab.nl/radsafe/
European Commission (EC)
Joint Research Centre (JRC)
Institute for Environment and Sustainability (IES)
TP 441, Via Fermi 1
21020 Ispra (VA)
Tel. +39 0332 78 9109
Fax. +39 0332 78 5466
Email: peter.bossew at jrc.it
"The views expressed are purely those of the writer and may not in any
circumstances be regarded as stating an official position of the European
More information about the RadSafe