[ RadSafe ] Testing bombs
Steven Dapra
sjd at swcp.com
Sat Jun 28 10:49:15 CDT 2008
June 28, 2008
From time to time I have read that one of the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombs
had to be tested before it was used, and that one did not --- that the
engineers were so certain the latter bomb would explode that they didn't
bother testing it. I also read recently that hydrogen bombs must be
tested. Of these three types of bombs, which ones must be tested, and
why? For the one that did not have to be tested, why not? (I don't have
any bombs I want to test, I am merely curious.)
Steven Dapra
sjd at swcp.com
More information about the RadSafe
mailing list