[ RadSafe ] Testing bombs
    Steven Dapra 
    sjd at swcp.com
       
    Sat Jun 28 10:49:15 CDT 2008
    
    
  
June 28, 2008
	From time to time I have read that one of the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombs 
had to be tested before it was used, and that one did not --- that the 
engineers were so certain the latter bomb would explode that they didn't 
bother testing it.  I also read recently that hydrogen bombs must be 
tested.  Of these three types of bombs, which ones must be tested, and 
why?  For the one that did not have to be tested, why not?  (I don't have 
any bombs I want to test, I am merely curious.)
Steven Dapra
sjd at swcp.com
    
    
More information about the RadSafe
mailing list