[ RadSafe ] DHS Tests of Radiation Detectors WereInconclusive, Report Says
Sawyer, Jeff
jeff.sawyer at thermofisher.com
Thu Mar 6 07:41:07 CST 2008
When was the last time you used a radiation monitor that hadn't first
been calibrated?
Jeff
[edit]
>With that certification in mind, the nuclear detection office conducted
>tests in Nevada early last year. Those tests were called into question
when
>GAO auditors found that department officials had allowed contractors to
>conduct "dress rehearsals" and calibrate their machines in anticipation
of
>the tests.
>The review team's report discounted the auditor's findings that the
tests
>were biased. The team also said it found no evidence the test data were
>manipulated.
March 4
What is the difference between this and outright collusion?
*Is*
there any difference?
Steven Dapra
>****************************************
>No comment.
>
>Clayton J. Bradt
>dutchbradt at hughes.net
_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood
the RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
http://radlab.nl/radsafe/radsaferules.html
For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
visit: http://radlab.nl/radsafe/
More information about the RadSafe
mailing list