[ RadSafe ] DHS Tests of Radiation Detectors WereInconclusive, Report Says

Sawyer, Jeff jeff.sawyer at thermofisher.com
Thu Mar 6 07:41:07 CST 2008


When was the last time you used a radiation monitor that hadn't first
been calibrated?

Jeff 

[edit]

>With that certification in mind, the nuclear detection office conducted
>tests in Nevada early last year. Those tests were called into question
when
>GAO auditors found that department officials had allowed contractors to
>conduct "dress rehearsals" and calibrate their machines in anticipation
of
>the tests.
>The review team's report discounted the auditor's findings that the
tests
>were biased. The team also said it found no evidence the test data were
>manipulated.

March 4

         What is the difference between this and outright collusion?
*Is* 
there any difference?

Steven Dapra


>****************************************
>No comment.
>
>Clayton J. Bradt
>dutchbradt at hughes.net

_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list

Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood
the RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
http://radlab.nl/radsafe/radsaferules.html

For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
visit: http://radlab.nl/radsafe/



More information about the RadSafe mailing list