Fw: Re: [ RadSafe ] PNAS Article: Oncogenic bystander radiation effects in Patched . . .

[HOWARD.LONG at comcast.net]

John,
Were you insincere in your offer below to radsafe, to send the article you comment upon?
Can you think of a better way to know that we are discussing exactly the same thing?

Please fax it to 925-846-4524!

Howard long

-------------- Original message -------------- 
From: John Jacobus <crispy_bird at yahoo.com> 

> As I mentioned below, I find your question ironic. 
> 
> +++++++++++++++++++ 
> It is also a good rule not to put overmuch confidence in the observational 
> results that are put forward until they are confirmed by theory. 
> Arthur Eddington 
> 
> 
> -- John 
> John Jacobus, MS 
> Certified Health Physicist 
> e-mail: crispy_bird at yahoo.com 
> 
> --- On Wed, 9/3/08, HOWARD.LONG at comcast.net wrote: 
> 
> From: HOWARD.LONG at comcast.net 
> Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] PNAS Article: Oncogenic bystander radiation effects in 
> Patched . . . 
> To: crispy_bird at yahoo.com 
> Date: Wednesday, September 3, 2008, 12:32 PM 
> 
> 
> 
> John, 
> I will confirm that we are talking about the same thing when I receive your 
> offered fax of the article at 
> 925-846-4524. 
> 
> Thank you, Howard long 
> 
> -------------- Original message -------------- 
> From: John Jacobus 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> You do not know what the discussion is about? I hope you get the irony. 
> 
> +++++++++++++++++++ 
> It is also a good rule not to put overmuch confidence in the observational 
> results that are put forward until they are confirmed by theory. 
> Arthur Eddington 
> 
> 
> -- John 
> John Jacobus, MS 
> Certified Health Physicist 
> e-mail: crispy_bird at yahoo.com 
> 
> --- On Tue, 9/2/08, HOWARD.LONG at comcast.net wrote: 
> 
> From: HOWARD.LONG at comcast.net 
> Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] PNAS Article: Oncogenic bystander radiation effects in 
> Patched . . . 
> To: crispy_bird at yahoo.com 
> Date: Tuesday, September 2, 2008, 12:08 PM 
> 
> 
> 
> John, to be sure I am reading what you are, please fax it to 925-846-4524. 
> 
> Thanks, 
> Howard long 
> 
> -------------- Original message -------------- 
> From: John Jacobus 
> 
> > If anyone is interested in a copy of this article please contace me directly. 
> > 
> > Mancuso M, et al.,"Oncogenic bystander radiation effects in Patched 
> heterozygous 
> > mouse cerebellum," PNAS, August 26, 2008, Vol. 105, No. 34, Pages 12445–12450 
> > 
> > I think that is really a first rate experiment demonstration the bystander 
> > effect in vivo. 
> > 
> > As a side note, scatter radiation is NOT associated with the response 
> observed. 
> > Once again, Dr. Long, it is important to READ the literature, unless jumping 
> to 
> > conclusions is the only exercise you get. 
> > 
> > 
> > +++++++++++++++++++ 
> > It is also a good rule not to put overmuch confidence in the observational 
> > results that are put forward until they are confirmed by theory. 
> > Arthur Eddington 
> > 
> > -- John 
> > John Jacobus, MS 
> > Certified Health Physicist 
> > e-mail: crispy_bird at yahoo.com 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________ 
> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list 
> 
> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the 
> RadSafe rules. These can be found at: http://radlab.nl/radsafe/radsaferules.html 
> 
> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit: 
> http://radlab.nl/radsafe/