[ RadSafe ] Concerns Could Reduce Radiation Sensor Deployment

[Maury Siskel]

It is unfortunate that this notion has everybody's drawers wound around 
their axles.. You just have failed to recognize the fact that RADSAFE 
has been protecting most of us from most evils for many years!!!!  Dog 
and I have watched 28-8 since 6-66-6 for any and all evils around our 
neighborhood. In lo these many years. no evils have showed their tail or 
nodded a head in this vicinity. We hear of them elsewhere, but still no 
problems here. The invaluable prophalactic value of RADSAFE against all 
evils should therefore be obvious to any and all interested parties. If 
you would party safely, subscribe NOW!
Cheers,
Maury&Dog  (Maury Siskel maurysis at peoplepc.com)
===================

Riely, Brian P. wrote:

>When 9/11 happened, all the experts that I heard guaranteed that within
>the next 5 yrs America would be hit by a major terrorist attack.  I have
>heard that there have been over 11,000 terrorist attacks world wide
>since 9/11 (I have not verified this statement but I think it is pretty
>clear that terrorist attacks world wide have increased since 9/11 --
>actually there have been a steady increase in terrorist attacks world
>wide since the end of the eighties)
>
>Maybe ever better to add to Gary's statement that tiger attacks greatly
>increased in surrounding areas, but where the tiger attacked were
>initially concentrated, those attacks have vanished.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl [mailto:radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl] On
>Behalf Of Livesey, Lee M
>Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 10:48 AM
>To: 'garyi at trinityphysics.com'; BLHamrick at aol.com; radsafe at radlab.nl
>Subject: RE: [ RadSafe ] Concerns Could Reduce Radiation Sensor
>Deployment
>
>
>Basic military strategy...........
>"Do not repeat the tactics which have gained you one victory, but let
>your methods be regulated by the infinite variety of circumstances." -
>Sun Tzu
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl [mailto:radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl] On
>Behalf Of garyi at trinityphysics.com
>Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 7:28 AM
>To: BLHamrick at aol.com; radsafe at radlab.nl
>Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] Concerns Could Reduce Radiation Sensor
>Deployment
>
>No, that's not a good analogy, because there is a history of terrorist
>attacks culminating in the
>911 attack, but tigers have never attacked you or your neighbours, and
>you did not plant the palm trees in an effort to protect yourself from
>tigers.
>
>It might be better to say that at one time there were widespread tiger
>attacks, and then after some counter action, the vast majority of tiger
>attacks are concentrated in one place where tiger killers lay in wait.
>That's more in line with the actual situation.
>
>-Gary Isenhower
>
>
>On 8 Sep 2008 at 20:19, BLHamrick at aol.com wrote:
>
>From:                   BLHamrick at aol.com
>Date sent:              Mon, 8 Sep 2008 20:19:28 EDT
>Subject:                Re: [ RadSafe ] Concerns Could Reduce Radiation
>Sensor
>Deployment
>To:                     cjb01 at health.state.ny.us,
>HOWARD.LONG at comcast.net
>Copies to:              radsafe at radlab.nl
>
>[ Double-click this line for list subscription options ]
>
>Oh, that's quite funny, and absolutely true.
>
>Also, in response to Howard, I have to say that the fact that there have
>not been other attacks in the U.S. is no proof that anything we've done
>has  been effective.  I could as easily say that the palm trees in my
>back yard  are effective tiger repellents, because I haven't ever had a
>tiger in my back  yard.
>
>Barbara
>
>
>In a message dated 9/8/2008 8:55:46 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
>cjb01 at health.state.ny.us writes:
>
>SDI is  actually a pretty good analogy.  It works, but only if there is
>only one missile at a time and we know its coming and what its
>trajectory  will be. Detecting nukes at the border would be effective
>under  similar circumstances: If we know the terrorist is coming, when
>he's coming  and where, it will be no problem to identify the nuke he's
>carrying.
>
>
>
>  
>