[ RadSafe ] Obama makes NO nuclear compromise topasscleanenergy bill and Provocation

Anthony Santoro santora at mail.rockefeller.edu
Thu Dec 10 14:42:13 CST 2009


I thought this was a radiation safety listserve, but judging by the content of many of the posts and responses it is anything but that.  

Anthony Santoro
Radiation Safety Officer
Chemical Waste Manager
Laboratory Safety & Environmental Health
The Rockefeller University 
 


-----Original Message-----
From: radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl [mailto:radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl] On Behalf Of garyi at trinityphysics.com
Sent: Friday, December 11, 2009 3:12 AM
To: radsafe at radlab.nl
Subject: RE: [ RadSafe ] Obama makes NO nuclear compromise topasscleanenergy bill


Backup, Mike.  Are you saying Bush fabricated evidence so he could start a war?  If so, I 
want to know if you also think he blew up the WTC.

-Gary Isenhower

On 10 Dec 2009 at 11:51, Brennan, Mike  (DOH) wrote:

I have been told repeatedly that the Bush Administration did not claim
that Iraq had anything to do with the 9/11 attacks, and that invading
Iraq was not connected to the Twin Towers.  Are you now saying that
they were wrong?

-----Original Message-----
From: radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl [mailto:radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl] On
Behalf Of Riely, Brian P. Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2009 11:03 AM
To: Flowerday, Scott; radsafe at radlab.nl Subject: RE: [ RadSafe ] Obama
makes NO nuclear compromise topasscleanenergy bill

he has not fabricated any evidence to start any new wars 

Wow!!  Are you really that gullible?  Do you also believe Bush blew up
the World Trade Center?

-----Original Message-----
From: radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl [mailto:radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl] On
Behalf Of Flowerday, Scott Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2009 1:47 PM
To: Perle, Sandy; garyi at trinityphysics.com; radsafe at radlab.nl Subject:
RE: [ RadSafe ] Obama makes NO nuclear compromise to passcleanenergy
bill

It might be good to quit drawing generalizations ("the majority of
Democrats").  Politics and science do not mix.  Pro-nuclear
Republicans elect representatives that aren't smart enough to
comprehend evolution (or they are smart enough but just not honest). 
Environmental Democrats aren't smart enough to understand the benefits
of nuclear power with respect to the environment.  I have decided that
there is too much stupidity on both sides of the aisle to embrace
either party and try to figure out which candidate will actually cause
the least amount of harm. Considering the eight years prior to
electing President Obama, my decision to vote for Obama was fairly
easy.

As far as showing Franz that there has been positive change under
Obama, I would suggest that the best evidence to date (that there has
been positive change) is that he has not fabricated any evidence to
start any new wars and seems to be intent on finding a way to end the
ones that he inherited.

Scott 

_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list

Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at: http://radlab.nl/radsafe/radsaferules.html

For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit: http://radlab.nl/radsafe/



More information about the RadSafe mailing list