[ RadSafe ] Obama makes NO nuclear compromise topasscleanenergy bill and Provocation

[gelsg at aol.com]

Anthony:

My conclusion is that they feel they are very generous in sharing their great wisdom with all of us who don't have their incisive insight.

Jerry Gels



-----Original Message-----
From: Anthony Santoro <santora at mail.rockefeller.edu>
To: radsafe at radlab.nl <radsafe at radlab.nl>
Sent: Thu, Dec 10, 2009 3:42 pm
Subject: RE: [ RadSafe ] Obama makes NO nuclear compromise topasscleanenergy bill and Provocation


I thought this was a radiation safety listserve, but judging by the content of 
any of the posts and responses it is anything but that.  
Anthony Santoro
adiation Safety Officer
hemical Waste Manager
aboratory Safety & Environmental Health
he Rockefeller University 


----Original Message-----
rom: radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl [mailto:radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl] On Behalf Of 
aryi at trinityphysics.com
ent: Friday, December 11, 2009 3:12 AM
o: radsafe at radlab.nl
ubject: RE: [ RadSafe ] Obama makes NO nuclear compromise topasscleanenergy 
ill

ackup, Mike.  Are you saying Bush fabricated evidence so he could start a war?  
f so, I 
ant to know if you also think he blew up the WTC.
-Gary Isenhower
On 10 Dec 2009 at 11:51, Brennan, Mike  (DOH) wrote:
I have been told repeatedly that the Bush Administration did not claim
hat Iraq had anything to do with the 9/11 attacks, and that invading
raq was not connected to the Twin Towers.  Are you now saying that
hey were wrong?
-----Original Message-----
rom: radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl [mailto:radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl] On
ehalf Of Riely, Brian P. Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2009 11:03 AM
o: Flowerday, Scott; radsafe at radlab.nl Subject: RE: [ RadSafe ] Obama
akes NO nuclear compromise topasscleanenergy bill
he has not fabricated any evidence to start any new wars 
Wow!!  Are you really that gullible?  Do you also believe Bush blew up
he World Trade Center?
-----Original Message-----
rom: radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl [mailto:radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl] On
ehalf Of Flowerday, Scott Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2009 1:47 PM
o: Perle, Sandy; garyi at trinityphysics.com; radsafe at radlab.nl Subject:
E: [ RadSafe ] Obama makes NO nuclear compromise to passcleanenergy
ill
It might be good to quit drawing generalizations ("the majority of
emocrats").  Politics and science do not mix.  Pro-nuclear
epublicans elect representatives that aren't smart enough to
omprehend evolution (or they are smart enough but just not honest). 
nvironmental Democrats aren't smart enough to understand the benefits
f nuclear power with respect to the environment.  I have decided that
here is too much stupidity on both sides of the aisle to embrace
ither party and try to figure out which candidate will actually cause
he least amount of harm. Considering the eight years prior to
lecting President Obama, my decision to vote for Obama was fairly
asy.
As far as showing Franz that there has been positive change under
bama, I would suggest that the best evidence to date (that there has
een positive change) is that he has not fabricated any evidence to
tart any new wars and seems to be intent on finding a way to end the
nes that he inherited.
Scott 
_______________________________________________
ou are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the 
adSafe rules. These can be found at: http://radlab.nl/radsafe/radsaferules.html
For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit: 
ttp://radlab.nl/radsafe/
______________________________________________
ou are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the 
adSafe rules. These can be found at: http://radlab.nl/radsafe/radsaferules.html
For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit: 
ttp://radlab.nl/radsafe/