[ RadSafe ] radiation risk
Tuttle, William K. (Portland)
William.Tuttle at va.gov
Tue May 5 09:15:31 CDT 2009
Scientific concerns aside, risk statements for human subjects are to be written at an 8th grade level-i.e. easily understood. This does not, in my opinion, meet that criteria.
William K. Tuttle III, PhD
Radiation Safety Officer
Portland VA Medical Center
Any and all opinions expressed in this message are mine alone and do not necessarily reflect those of the Portland VA Medical Center, The Department of Veterans Affairs, or the United States Government.
This transmission is intended only for the use of the person or office to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential, or protected by law. All others are hereby notified that receipt of this message does not waive any applicable privilege or exemption from disclosure and that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify me immediately at the following telephone number: 503-220-8262, ext 55853. Thank you.
From: radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl [mailto:radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl] On Behalf Of al gerhart
Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2009 7:09 PM
To: radsafe at radlab.nl
Subject: [ RadSafe ] radiation risk
Could I get some comments on this statement? I don't think this person has both oars in the water.
"The evidence for low-level carcinogenicity is virtually non-existent. "
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at: http://radlab.nl/radsafe/radsaferules.html
For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit: http://radlab.nl/radsafe/
More information about the RadSafe