[ RadSafe ] cesium 137 check source rate

[blreider at aol.com]

I see all sorts of little strings of thoughts here and perhaps they should be tied together.  People have commented on compliance, technical basis and procedural issues.  Curiosity has initated thoughts of why a source was mailed to you, what are you doing with the source?  Why do you need conact dose rates? 


Anyway here goes my unrequested advice.  Perhaps you have done all of this, in which case please forgive my butting in!

For any program involving radioactive substances or radiation generating devices the following are necessary:

1.  Knowledge of all governing regulations and requirements for the materials and tasks.
2.  Technical basis defining type and form of hazards, use of materials, measurement methods and sensitivities of measurement methods. 
3.  Procedure for implementing the above.

Of course these do not need to be extensive for low hazad items and there are lots of documents online regarding point sources of Cs137, so no need to reinvent the wheel.  

Barbara Reider, CHP






-----Original Message-----
From: Dixon, John E. (CDC/ONDIEH/NCEH) (CDC/ONDIEH/NCEH) <gyf7 at cdc.gov>
To: The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) Mailing List <radsafe at health.phys.iit.edu>
Sent: Wed, Aug 18, 2010 1:16 pm
Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] cesium 137 check source rate


Hopefully, whomever shipped it did so with appropriate controls and
onitoring. Was this a US shipped source within the USA? I 'd like to
now what was done upon its receipt.
Regards,
ohn Dixon
-----Original Message-----
rom: radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu
mailto:radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu] On Behalf Of William Lipton
ent: Wednesday, August 18, 2010 12:36 PM
o: The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) Mailing List
ubject: Re: [ RadSafe ] cesium 137 check source rate
I question the wisdom of handling a source without proper survey
nstruments.  The source could be mislabeled.  Even worse, it could be
eaking, in which case you've contaminated yourself and your facility by
ow.
Bill Lipton
t's not about dose, it's about trust.

On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 4:21 AM, Harley Vance <harleyvance at ymail.com>
rote:
> I just got a cesium 10 microcurie test source in the mail, and I
aven't
 gotten my geiger counter yet.
 My question is, what is the approximate rate of radiation at the
urface of
 the disc?

 It is blue and I believe it is encased in some kind of epoxy.

 Thanks!




 _______________________________________________
 You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list

 Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and
nderstood the
 RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
 http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html

 For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
 visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu

______________________________________________
ou are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood
he RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
ttp://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
isit: http://health.phys.iit.edu

______________________________________________
ou are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the 
adSafe rules. These can be found at: http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit: 
ttp://health.phys.iit.edu