[ RadSafe ] Two interesting papers on DNA repair mechanisms radiation is secular
parthasarathy k s
ksparth at yahoo.co.uk
Fri Jul 2 13:40:16 CDT 2010
Reider,
Chances are that breaks induced by ionizing radiation are random as
radiation is truly secular!
Regards
Parthasarathy
________________________________
From: "blreider at aol.com" <blreider at aol.com>
To: CJB01 at health.state.ny.us; radsafe at health.phys.iit.edu
Sent: Fri, 2 July, 2010 23:58:08
Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] Two interesting papers on DNA repair mechanisms
Clayton,
Hope you are well. I see from your signature that you either have changed jobs
or you have new stationary yet again.
I don't understand why the two statements are a contradiction. Cancer is a
general name for numerous diseases with numerous causes. Not all non-radiation
initiated cancers have to also be initiated by radiation. Are you saying that
all radiation initiated cancers also don't have another cause? I guess that
could be true if there are no non-radiation causes for random DNA strand
breaks.*
I don't know enough about the different cervical cancers to add anything about
the molecular structure, however for other cancers there can be many different
initial cell types all lumped together under the name of the organ involved. Is
all cervical cancer initiated in the same type of cell? Lung cancer has
numerous initial lung cell types, and some of the same types of lung cancers
that are attributed to smoking are also attributed to radiation
(Adenocarcenoma). Smoking also is linked to other types of lung cancers that
are not thought to be radiation induced (small cell).
The research to find mechanisms for cancer production is interesting as applied
to the statistics used in our field, hence previous comments about LET and QF.
Regards
Barbara Reider, CHP
*And to make this more difficult, perhaps indirect radiation induced strand
breaks are not all random. I though the early cell data showed random breaks
though (anyone with newer info?).
-----Original Message-----
From: Clayton J Bradt <CJB01 at health.state.ny.us>
To: radsafe <radsafe at health.phys.iit.edu>
Sent: Fri, Jul 2, 2010 1:45 pm
Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] Two interesting papers on DNA repair mechanisms
I'll be eager to read these papers hopefully over the holiday weekend.
That's the 4th of July for you non-US citizens on the list.)
hat still puzzles me about the entire subject is the contradiction
etween these two presumed facts:
) Cancers caused by radiation are indistinguishable from non-radiogenic
ancers. 2) Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) causes cervical cancer.
The first statement can't be true, because cervical cancer cells caused by
PV have virus genes spliced into their DNA. These virus genes function
n specific ways to overcome some of the cells' control mechanisms and
llow for uncontrolled proliferation. It is hard to believe that random
adiogenic DNA damage and misrepair (no matter what the mechanisms) could
uplicate these exact same virus genes in affected cells. So either
adiation can't cause cervical cancer, or it causes a different kind of
ervical cancer than HPV infection and there is a genetic marker that can
istinguish the two.
How many other cancers are the result of the incorporation viral genetic
aterial? Are the mutations that result in oncogenesis ever the result of
andom damage and/or misrepair?
Clayton J. Bradt
rincipal Radiophysicist
aboratory for Inorganic & Nuclear Chemistry
YS Dept. of Health
18-474-1993
MPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential or
ensitive information which is, or may be, legally privileged or otherwise
rotected by law from further disclosure. It is intended only for the addressee.
f you received this in error or from someone who was not authorized to send it
o you, please do not distribute, copy or use it or any attachments. Please
otify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this from your system.
hank you for your cooperation.
_______________________________________________
ou are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the
adSafe rules. These can be found at:
http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit:
ttp://health.phys.iit.edu
_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the
RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit:
http://health.phys.iit.edu
More information about the RadSafe
mailing list