[ RadSafe ] Bill would require health warnings on Maine cell phones

Tue Mar 2 15:15:23 CST 2010

Yes, Sandy, you are absolutely correct with your comment. Shortly after the
Chernobyl accident I was asked by the International Institute of Applied
System Analysis (IIASA) in Laxenburg (not "Luxembourg"!) near Vienna to work
a little with them on the question of risk and risk perception, referring to
the accident and the Europe wide contamination. I learnt a lot and one of
the main topics about risk perception was that concern and public interest
is only raised when there is a large number of casualities within a short
time period like in train crashes, aircraft accidents, tsunamis, earthquakes
and similar catastrophes or if a potential unrealistic large danger is
perceived or - in this context - "predicted" by the mass media, citing the
well known "experts".

Could it be that it is a kind of a mental defense strategy, that people
avoid thinking about car accidents - because they know anyhow, how easily
they may become victim of one? 

Best regards,

Franz 

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Perle, Sandy [mailto:SPerle at mirion.com] 
Gesendet: Dienstag, 02. März 2010 00:01
An: 'edmond0033 at comcast.net'; 'Franz Schönhofer'
Cc: 'radsafe at health.phys.iit.edu'
Betreff: RE: [ RadSafe ] Bill would require health warnings on Maine cell
phones

There have been many studies and presentations on public perceptions on
risk. Death by car accidents is so common place, nobody gives a second
thought to the evening news where individuals have been killed in an
accident. Annual statistics is significant, but is accepted without any
emotion. However, an unusual event, with low probability, raises concern and
interest. A train crash with dozens lost, an aircraft crash with several
hundred deaths, lots of public attention. It's the fear of the unknown, such
as radiation, and large casualties that raises public interest. Human
nature. It's not going to change. Perceptions outweigh reality. The risk of
a nuclear incident is high where the probability is very small. It would be
nice to change this paradigm, but the probability of changing that is also
very low!

-----------------------------------
Sander C. Perle
President
Mirion Technologies
Dosimetry Services Division
2652 McGaw Avenue
Irvine, CA 92614

+1 (949) 296-2306 (Office)
+1 (949) 296-1144 (Fax)

Mirion Technologies: http://www.mirion.com/

 -----Original Message-----
From: radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu
[mailto:radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu] On Behalf Of
edmond0033 at comcast.net
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2010 2:54 PM
To: Franz Schönhofer
Cc: radsafe at health.phys.iit.edu
Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] Bill would require health warnings on Maine cell
phones

I have heard that there is a group that claims that the wireing in houses
emit radiation that is 'dangerous'. Also the radiation from high tension
wires that emit radiation is 'dangerous'.  As Franz said,I believe, that
life is dangerous.  I know of several persons (one related) died of brain
tunors that were cancerous. This ws before cell phones??  One of these
persons had a tumor that was not cancerous.

Ed Baratta

edmond0033 at comcast.net

----- Original Message -----
From: "Franz Schönhofer" <franz.schoenhofer at chello.at>
To: "Robert' 'Yoss" <ryoss at mcw.edu>, radsafe at health.phys.iit.edu
Sent: Monday, March 1, 2010 5:18:08 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] Bill would require health warnings on Maine cell
phones

I hope there will be a similar bill to require all cars to attach warnings
that using a car either as a driver or a passenger is extremely dangerous
and will quite often be deadly. You know better than me, how many people die
there every year, every month or every day in car accidents. In theses cases
the reason is without doubt clear and does not need ridiculous speculations
like about "radiation".

Extend this reasoning to other everyday situations ad libitum.

Best regards,

Franz

Franz Schoenhofer, PhD
MinRat i.R.
Habicherg. 31/7
A-1160 Wien/Vienna
AUSTRIA

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu
[mailto:radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu] Im Auftrag von Yoss, Robert
Gesendet: Montag, 01. März 2010 21:17
An: radsafe at health.phys.iit.edu
Betreff: [ RadSafe ] Bill would require health warnings on Maine cell phones

STATE HOUSE

February 28

Bill would require health warnings on Maine cell phones

During lunch in late April 1995, Lloyd Morgan collapsed on the floor and had
a 45-minute seizure. Doctors later found a tumor the size of a peach in his
brain. They could not operate, he said, because his brain was so swollen
that it might herniate.

"The only place that your brain can go if the pressure builds up enough is
down into the brain stem," Morgan said. "But that kills you."

After eight days in critical condition, doctors successfully removed the
tumor. Morgan's neurologist told him electromagnetic radiation may have
caused it. Since then, he has become a champion for revealing the effects
this radiation -- the sort that is emitted by cell phones -- on the brain.

Tuesday, he will testify before the Legislature's Health and Human Services
Committee when it hears L.D. 1706, which would make Maine the first state to
put warnings on cell phones. They would say the electromagnetic radiation
the phone emits could cause brain cancer and that users -- particularly kids
and pregnant women -- should use caution.

It is estimated that, of Maine's 1.3 million people, 950,000 use cell
phones.

"I'm not an anti-technology person," said Rep. Andrea Boland, D-Sanford, the
bill's sponsor. "My concern is that we have enormously powerful industries
that can scoot responsibilities because they do have so much power and they
have products that we like so much."

Boland, whose husband died of cancer, said she began to ask questions about
the safety of cell phones after a professional conference two and a half
years ago. Since then, she has found "serious, independent, scientific
studies that show danger."

The wireless industry's trade association, CTIA, says the government has
regulated cell phones for safety.

"Congress has given the (Federal Communications Commission) the
responsibility for setting the safe levels of radio frequency exposure,"
said John Walls, CTIA's vice president of public affairs. "The FCC has
relied on the scientific expertise of agencies such as the Food and Drug
Administration and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration."

The relationship between these agencies on this issue, however, is unclear.

The FCC, on its Web site, includes this statement: "Working closely with
federal health and safety agencies, such as the Food and Drug Administration
(FDA), the FCC has adopted limits for safe exposure to radiofrequency (RF)
energy."

The FDA also has a statement on its Web site; it says the agency lacks the
responsibility to review cell phone safety.

"Under the law, FDA does not review the safety of radiation-emitting
consumer products such as cell phones and similar wireless devices before
they can be sold, as it does with new drugs or medical devices. However, FDA
does have the authority to take action if cell phones are shown to emit
radiofrequency energy (RF) at a level that is hazardous to the user."

Supporters of L.D. 1706 said there is a difference between proving safety
and not proving danger.

"The industry used to say that they met all applicable safety standards,"
said George Carlo, a lawyer and pathologist who taught at George Washington
Medical School for 20 years. "Well, that's true. There are none."

Beginning in 1993, Carlo supervised a study sponsored by CTIA that came
about, he said, after a Florida court case that attracted some national
attention when David Reynard, who had sued several telecommunications
companies, said on national television his wife died because of a brain
tumor caused by a cell phone.

Carlo said he was asked to design and run a study that would be
peer-reviewed and involve 200 doctors from around the world. It lasted for
six years and cost the industry $28.5 million.

"We found genetic damage in human blood exposed to cell phone radiation," he
said in an interview Friday. "We found an increased risk of tumors of the
acoustic nerve. We found more than a doubling of the risk of neuroepithelial
tumors."

This class of tumor affects a type of cell in the brain, and is the same
kind that killed David Reynard's wife, said Carlo, the co-author of "Cell
Phones, Invisible Hazards in the Wireless Age."

"Finding genetic damage in human blood is enough to prevent any product from
finding its way into commerce," he said. "I made the recommendation that a
warning label be put on phones, to both the industry and the government, in
1999."

Walls said that the CTIA is confident cell phones are safe.

"What we relied on is the expertise of renowned health agencies around the
world who have reviewed numerous studies that have been conducted over an
extended period of time, and based on their review, those organizations and
agencies have concluded that there are no adverse health affects," he said.

Carlo questioned that body of science, saying that industry paid for studies
that supported its claims.

"Those studies that are independent of industry funding are six times more
likely to find a problem than those that are funded by industry," Carlo
said.

Morgan, the victim of a brain tumor who has become an advocate for cell
phone caution, published a review of the research in the peer-reviewed
journal Pathophysiology.

Studies of the effects cell phone use for a few years are inconclusive, he
said, but "industry studies and independent studies, when combined for more
than 10 years of use, show a doubling of brain tumors."

At this point, said Carlo, the government would not ban cell phones even if
it was accepted that they were dangerous.

"From a political point of view, when you have almost 200 million people
using something, it isn't a good idea to take it away," he said. "The only
public health step that can be taken is a warning to consumers."

Ethan Wilensky-Lanford -- 620-7016

ewlanford at mainetoday.com _______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list

Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the
RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html

For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit:
http://health.phys.iit.edu

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 9.0.733 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2715 - Release Date: 03/01/10
08:34:00

_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list

Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the
RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html

For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit:
http://health.phys.iit.edu _______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list

Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the
RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html

For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit:
http://health.phys.iit.edu

PROPRIETARY INFORMATION NOTICE:   This e-mail message and all attachments
transmitted with it are intended solely for use by the addressee and may
contain proprietary information of Mirion Technologies and/or its
affiliates.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient,
you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution,
copying or other use of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by
replying to the message, delete the original message and all attachments
from your computer, and destroy any copies you may have made.  Thank you.
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
Version: 9.0.733 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2715 - Release Date: 03/01/10
08:34:00