[ RadSafe ] Nuclear Power as Part of Our Energy Surety & Economic Security Future (Part 1)

[Dan W McCarn]

See:

Pelizza, Mark and McCarn, Dan W., (2004): Licensing of In Situ Leach
Recovery Operations for the Crownpoint and Church Rock Uranium Deposits, New
Mexico: A Case Study, IAEA-TECDOC-1396. (this was also published in the AIPG
journal in 2003 or 4.


--
Dan W McCarn, Geologist
2867 A Fuego Sagrado
Santa Fe, NM 87505
+1-505-310-3922 (Mobile - New Mexico)
HotGreenChile at gmail.com (Private email)

-----Original Message-----
From: radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu
[mailto:radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu] On Behalf Of Miller, Mark L
Sent: Monday, March 15, 2010 08:03
To: 'radsafe at health.phys.iit.edu'
Subject: [ RadSafe ] Nuclear Power as Part of Our Energy Surety & Economic
Security Future (Part 1)

With the current global warming issues and looming energy crisis, we must
objectively evaluate the facts regarding the world energy crisis and based
on the weight of the evidence, draw reasonable conclusions from them and
then strive to see that they are implemented on a national and even world
scale.  There is no question that there will be increasing potential for
regional and global conflict over access to conventional energy resources
which are essential to achieving a better standard of living.  However,
today, we are faced with the stark reality of finite fossil energy reserves,
the threat of global warming, overpopulation, economic turmoil and the
world's "have-nots" striving to attain the standard of life enjoyed by the
world's "haves".
The U.S. obtains 73% of the energy it consumes from CO2-producing sources.
97% of U.S. transportation uses oil (train, truck, car, agriculture) 70+% of
this oil is imported, most of it from countries of the world that are
politically unstable and don't like Westerners.  This is up from ~30% prior
to the 1973 oil embargo.  Since then every President has proclaimed that the
U.S. would reduce its dependence on foreign oil - to no apparent effect.
Are we missing something here?
By reliable, I mean that is it available 24/7/365

Regardless of where you live - large country or small, your future energy
supply must be:
* reliable,
* sustainable,
* environmentally friendly,
* affordable and,
* available.
By reliable, I mean that is it available 24/7/365.  Unfortunately
renewables, although essential to every country's energy portfolio, are not
capable of delivering on this essential characteristic which is needed for
baseload generation (have you ever tried to power a steel plant with solar
power?).  Sustainable means that it does not deplete finite resources.
Environmentally friendly can be a catch-all, but for now I'll assign this
bugbear to CO2 and global warming.  The meaning of affordable is obvious,
but may mean dramatically different things to people from different economic
strata.  Historically in this country, cost was no object.  Our per-capita
prosperity was off the charts (in global terms) and was completely taken for
granted (nolo contendere).  With the bursting of the United States' and the
world's economic bubble, capital cost matters!





_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list

Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the
RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html

For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit:
http://health.phys.iit.edu