[ RadSafe ] World’s Pilots Reject Naked Body Scanners Over Radiation Danger, Privacy Breach (re-sending without images)
McClung, Danny
Danny.McClung2 at va.gov
Tue Nov 9 09:39:03 CST 2010
I understand the concept, Doug. Their statement (designed so a layperson can understand) seems excessive to me (600 mrem or 6 mSv per hour). So how much exposure are they really getting during a solar flare event vs. a normal transatlantic flight?
Dan
Danny K. McClung, BS, RRPT
Program Manager, MERRT
(Medical Emergency Radiological Response Team)
Department of Veterans Affairs
-----Original Message-----
From: radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu [mailto:radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu] On Behalf Of Doug Huffman
Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2010 9:37 AM
To: The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) Mailing List
Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] World’s Pilots Reject Naked Body Scanners Over Radiation Danger, Privacy Breach (re-sending without images)
Apples to oranges; 0.06mSv but not whole body exposure that the pilots get.
On 11/8/2010 18:48, McClung, Danny wrote:
> Seriously? 100 chest x-rays per hour?
>
> Dan McClung
> Dept of Veterans Affairs
> ----------------------
>
_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at: http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu
More information about the RadSafe
mailing list