[ RadSafe ] Definition of "pollution

Sat Oct 23 15:53:51 CDT 2010

Carbon dioxide is just another compound. But the concentrations of this compound are much higher in the very source of this entire controversy...Washington DC. This is the source of much more trouble than good in the US. Perhaps we should penalize this source? Remember the whole subject about CO2 is about power, control, and money. Those really beating this drum do not care about everyday people, only the subjugation and silencing of common sense. 

Just my opinnion

John Dixon

----- Original Message -----
From: radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu <radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu>
To: Jerry Cohen <jjcohen at prodigy.net>; The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) Mailing List <radsafe at health.phys.iit.edu>
Sent: Sat Oct 23 19:00:55 2010
Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] Definition of "pollution

Hi Maury

I have said before that if CO2 is a pollution, how come we exhale it and the 
vegetation absorbs it?  Maybe the politicians should hold there breaths for 
one hour each day or at least stop their longwinded speeches.  Also we 
should wear masks to prevent Radon (Rn) from entering our lungs as EPA 
considers it a huge problem.  The Country is being ruled by a bunch of (add 
your own adjective).

Ed Baratta

edmond0033 at comcast.net

--------------------------------------------------
From: "Maury Siskel" <maurysis at peoplepc.com>
Sent: Friday, October 22, 2010 3:53 PM
To: "Jerry Cohen" <jjcohen at prodigy.net>; "The International Radiation 
Protection (Health Physics) Mailing List" <radsafe at health.phys.iit.edu>
Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] Definition of "pollution

> Yeah Jerry, but you have to add that EPA and the Supreme Court do not 
> like.  How will we be handled as continuous emitters of CO2?
> Maury&Dog  (Maury Siskel maurysis at peoplepc.com]
> ===============================
> Jerry Cohen wrote:
>
>>So, CO2 is a pollutant. From current dialog on the subject a new 
>>all-encompaaing definition of pollution seems to have emerged---
>>Pollution is anything thatyou release to the environment, and that I don't 
>>like.
>>
>>
>>
>>________________________________
>>From: "Ottley, David B (Dave)" <David_B_Dave_Ottley at RL.gov>
>>To: "radsafe at agni.phys.iit.edu" <radsafe at agni.phys.iit.edu>
>>Sent: Thu, October 21, 2010 7:46:27 PM
>>Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] RadSafe Digest, Vol 438, Issue 1
>>
>>Substituting "radiation" for "CO2" isn't this like saying, "Temporarily 
>>ignoring whether or not radiation is harmful,
> ----------------snipped--------------
> _______________________________________________
> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
>
> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood 
> the RadSafe rules. These can be found at: 
> http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
>
> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings 
> visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu
> 
_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list

Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at: http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html

For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu