[ RadSafe ] If they really want a SNF repository...

John R Johnson idias at interchange.ubc.ca
Wed Sep 22 18:07:45 CDT 2010

And who would decide if we should have a "P" or an "N"?
John R Johnson, PhD
4535 West 9th Ave
Vancouver, B. C.
V6R 2E2, Canada
idias at interchange.ubc.ca

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Steven Dapra" <sjd at swcp.com>
To: "The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) Mailing List" 
<radsafe at agni.phys.iit.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 3:53 PM
Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] If they really want a SNF repository...

> Sept. 22
>         Instead of namby pamby, we need a PIMBY with no NIMBY.
> Steven Dapra
> At 10:47 AM 9/22/2010, you [Mike Brennan] wrote:
>>If the Government REALLY wanted a repository, all they would have to do is 
>>give the minimum physical requirements, and state that residence of the 
>>host county would be exempted from Federal income tax, starting when SNF 
>>started arriving, but that income tax would be back in effect at any time 
>>that shipments were stopped due to legal actions, etc.
>>I suspect it would create a PIMBY (Please In My Back Yard) movement.
> _______________________________________________
> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood 
> the RadSafe rules. These can be found at: 
> http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings 
> visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu 

More information about the RadSafe mailing list