[ RadSafe ] Medical x-ray vs. CAT scan
ALSTONCJ at gunet.georgetown.edu
Tue Sep 28 09:21:05 CDT 2010
The doc likely could not tell that he would need a CAT scan, until he saw the radiography.
From: Joel C. [mailto:cehn at aol.com]
Sent: Friday, September 24, 2010 2:25 PM
To: radsafe at health.phys.iit.edu
Subject: [ RadSafe ] Medical x-ray vs. CAT scan
My wife recently had an x-ray; they were looking for a bone fracture. The Dr. wasn't happy with the x-ray and ordered a CAT scan. Is there any reason why drs. don't skip the standard "film" and go right to the CAT scan, if they suspect they need the extra resolution? Do they have to show that the film isn't adequate first? I know the film exposure is low, but if there's no benefit...
Joel I. Cehn, CHP
CONFIDENTIAL: The information contained in this communication,
including its attachments may contain confidential information and
is intended only for the individual (s) or entity (ies) to whom it
is addressed . The information contained in this communication may
also be protected by legal privilege , federal law or other
applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient of this
communication , you are hereby notified that any distribution,
dissemination or duplication of this communication is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error please
immediately delete and destroy all copies of this message and
please immediately notify us of the error by separate communication
. Thank you.
More information about the RadSafe