[ RadSafe ] Developing Body of Evidence to Refute Mangano andColleagues

[Steven Dapra]

April 19

         Post your paper so we can take advantage of your honesty and 
your (purported) facts.  We're all eagerly awaiting its appearance here.

Steven Dapra



At 05:00 AM 4/19/2011, you wrote:
>There are two ways.
>
>The first is to be honest and look at the facts, at the research 
>results, and argue the case. We can do that.
>The second is to ignore the facts, the research results, and attack me.
>The first is the behaviour of the scientist.
>The second is the way of the fool.
>
>You choose.
>
>
>Sincerely
>
>Chris
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: radsafe-bounces at agni.phys.iit.edu on behalf of Steven Dapra
>Sent: Fri 15/04/2011 02:56
>To: The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) Mailing List
>Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] Developing Body of Evidence to Refute 
>Mangano andColleagues
>
>April 14
>
>          Well, Chris, why don't you give us the benefit of your vast
>erudition and show us the way.
>
>Steven Dapra
>
>
>
>At 04:36 AM 4/14/2011, you wrote:
>
> >Hello guys.
> >I expected this level of scientific discussion.
> >And I was not disappointed.
> >You know all this will end up in a philosophy paper somewhere I wsuppose.
> >Love to all
> >Chris Busby

[edit]