[ RadSafe ] Developing Body of Evidence to Refute Mangano andColleagues
C.Busby at ulster.ac.uk
Wed Apr 20 06:12:19 CDT 2011
Here is the paper:
From: radsafe-bounces at agni.phys.iit.edu on behalf of Steven Dapra
Sent: Wed 20/04/2011 03:25
To: The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) Mailing List
Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] Developing Body of Evidence to Refute Mangano andColleagues
Post your paper so we can take advantage of your honesty and
your (purported) facts. We're all eagerly awaiting its appearance here.
At 05:00 AM 4/19/2011, you wrote:
>There are two ways.
>The first is to be honest and look at the facts, at the research
>results, and argue the case. We can do that.
>The second is to ignore the facts, the research results, and attack me.
>The first is the behaviour of the scientist.
>The second is the way of the fool.
>From: radsafe-bounces at agni.phys.iit.edu on behalf of Steven Dapra
>Sent: Fri 15/04/2011 02:56
>To: The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) Mailing List
>Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] Developing Body of Evidence to Refute
> Well, Chris, why don't you give us the benefit of your vast
>erudition and show us the way.
>At 04:36 AM 4/14/2011, you wrote:
> >Hello guys.
> >I expected this level of scientific discussion.
> >And I was not disappointed.
> >You know all this will end up in a philosophy paper somewhere I wsuppose.
> >Love to all
> >Chris Busby
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at: http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu
More information about the RadSafe