[ RadSafe ] FW: Reporter'squestionabout lower limitsofdetection (BUSBY)
sjd at swcp.com
Tue Aug 9 20:19:47 CDT 2011
At 11:32 AM 8/9/2011, you wrote:
>I have not consistently responded to respectful criticism with ad homs.
>I would also like evidence of being repeatedly caught trying to
>slide poor quality to fraudulent data.
Your article alleging post-Chernobyl infant leukemias was
fraudulent and I showed conclusively that it was. You never
thoroughly addressed my critique.
You claimed that infant mortality was caused by Sr-90, and
then posted a graph from your book "Wings of Death" showing levels of
Cs-137. I'd call that fraud.
>If you are referring to the internet attacks on me, none of that is
>true but since it is anonymous i can do nothing about it.
>When I appear in court, this kind of rubbish is alway brought up and
>the judge always throw it out.
>From: radsafe-bounces at agni.phys.iit.edu on behalf of Brennan, Mike (DOH)
>Sent: Mon 08/08/2011 21:58
>To: The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) MailingList
>Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] FW:
>Reporter'squestionabout lower limitsofdetection (BUSBY)
>It does, however, become hard to consider the data someone presents when
>they have established a long history of doing bad science. It is also
>hard to be respectful of someone when they consistently respond to
>respectful criticism with ad homs and intentional misrepresentations of
>the criticism. I is difficult to respect the integrity of someone who
>repeatedly gets caught trying to slide poor quality-to-fraudulent "data"
More information about the RadSafe