[ RadSafe ] FW: Reporter'squestionabout lower limitsofdetection (BUSBY)

Busby, Chris C.Busby at ulster.ac.uk
Wed Aug 10 04:57:39 CDT 2011

1. No you didnt show it was fraudulent
2. If I did paste  a Cs 137 trend then that was an error. I thought I have pasted a Sr90 one. I meant to paste the Sr90 one which is in teh book, not fraudulent, just too much to do.

-----Original Message-----
From: radsafe-bounces at agni.phys.iit.edu on behalf of Steven Dapra
Sent: Wed 10/08/2011 02:19
To: The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) Mailing List
Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] FW: Reporter'squestionabout	lower	limitsofdetection (BUSBY)
At 11:32 AM 8/9/2011, you wrote:

>Dear Mike,
>I have not consistently responded to respectful criticism with ad homs.
>I would also like evidence of being repeatedly caught trying to 
>slide poor quality to fraudulent data.

Aug. 9

         Your article alleging post-Chernobyl infant leukemias was 
fraudulent and I showed conclusively that it was.  You never 
thoroughly addressed my critique.

         You claimed that infant mortality was caused by Sr-90, and 
then posted a graph from your book "Wings of Death" showing levels of 
Cs-137.  I'd call that fraud.

Steven Dapra

>If you are referring to the internet attacks on me, none of that is 
>true but since it is anonymous i can do nothing about it.
>When I appear in court, this kind of rubbish is alway brought up and 
>the judge always throw it out.
>Best regards
>-----Original Message-----
>From: radsafe-bounces at agni.phys.iit.edu on behalf of Brennan, Mike  (DOH)
>Sent: Mon 08/08/2011 21:58
>To: The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) MailingList
>Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] FW: 
>Reporter'squestionabout    lower   limitsofdetection (BUSBY)
>It does, however, become hard to consider the data someone presents when
>they have established a long history of doing bad science.  It is also
>hard to be respectful of someone when they consistently respond to
>respectful criticism with ad homs and intentional misrepresentations of
>the criticism.  I is difficult to respect the integrity of someone who
>repeatedly gets caught trying to slide poor quality-to-fraudulent "data"

You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list

Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at: http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html

For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu

More information about the RadSafe mailing list