[ RadSafe ] Removal of Cs-137 source from an old irradiator

[Wasiolek, Maryla]

I may have misinterpreted the interactions with OSRP because I was not directly involved. In any case, I can see that it may be worthwhile to pursue that path.  Many thanks for the information.

-----Original Message-----
From: radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu [mailto:radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu] On Behalf Of Vernig, Peter G.
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2011 1:29 PM
To: The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) MailingList
Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] Removal of Cs-137 source from an old irradiator

Like Roy, I had OSRP remove an irradiator and it took longer than two years for the wait, I think because the irradiator was constructed before the US had type B shipping container specs. The unit met international specs but not US. And on top of that it was an AECL irradiator and they did not update or renew the type certification so they had to over pack it in a type B container.

Anyway I am surprised if they said it didn't fit with their mission, I thought that is what OSRP was all about getting old high activity sources into permanent secure storage.

 Any opinions in this e-mail are solely those of the author, and are not represented as those of the VA Eastern Colorado HCS, the Dept. of Veterans Affairs, or the US Government.

Peter G. Vernig,RSO


-----Original Message-----
From: radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu [mailto:radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu] On Behalf Of ROY HERREN
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2011 1:20 PM
To: The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) Mailing List; The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) MailingList
Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] Removal of Cs-137 source from an old irradiator