[ RadSafe ] NRC reform

[Brennan, Mike (DOH)]

It's a shame you didn't read the article before deciding it supported
your position on something unrelated.

-----Original Message-----
From: radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu
[mailto:radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu] On Behalf Of James Salsman
Sent: Sunday, December 11, 2011 12:13 PM
To: radsafe at health.phys.iit.edu
Subject: [ RadSafe ] NRC reform

I've been following the NRC difficulties, e.g.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/12/10/us-usa-energy-nuclear-idUSTRE7
B903N20111210

with some interest.  While this probably has something to do with the
fact that wind power is selling for a fifth the wholesale cost of
nuclear (less if decommissioning and waste storage costs are included)
I think professional education of safety inspectors might have
something to do with it.  So I have a proposal for reform, as follows:

1. Make sure Health Physics Society members know what genotoxins are.

2. There is no number 2.

I hope it works out.

Sincerely,
James Salsman
_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list

Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood
the RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html

For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu