[ RadSafe ] Los Alamos Evacuation & Fire

Dan W McCarn hotgreenchile at gmail.com
Sat Jul 2 13:20:07 CDT 2011


Hello Group:

At least 113,734 Acres (46,027 Hectares) have burned so far, Los Alamos is
still under mandatory evacuation, and there is now some talk about a phased
return, but the schedule has yet to be determined. 

We have 3 dogs, 2 cats and 1 horse with us in Santa Fe.  The evacuation of
over 100 horses, a dozen goats, 5-6 alpacas and quite a few rabbits, ducks,
chickens and turkeys went very smoothly.  Several horses could not be
initially loaded onto trailers and required sedatives to load.  One horse
was injured during the evacuation but is recovering from leg lacerations.

White Rock (a suburb of Los Alamos) was never placed on mandatory
evacuation, but because of the smoke, burned fragments of bark and other
tree fragments and dense smoke, most of the residents have evacuated.

Dan ii

--
Dan W McCarn, Geologist
108 Sherwood Blvd
Los Alamos, NM 87544-3425
+1-505-672-2014 (Home - New Mexico)
+1-505-670-8123 (Mobile - New Mexico)
HotGreenChile at gmail.com (Private email) HotGreenChile at gmail dot com




-----Original Message-----
From: radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu
[mailto:radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu] On Behalf Of Jeff Terry
Sent: Saturday, July 02, 2011 00:01
To: Jeff Terry
Cc: The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) Mailing List
Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] SL1 Accident Video

You may be referring to this one. 

http://www.directcinema.com/dcl/title.php?id=580&list=44,468,53,143,397,580,
509,102&cat_id=55

Sent from my iPhone

On Jul 2, 2011, at 12:58 AM, Jeff Terry <terryj at iit.edu> wrote:

> I have this DVD on SL-1. I like it, although I am not sure if it is the
one you are talking about. 
> 
> http://www.radiationworks.com/atomicstore.htm
> 
> Jeff
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> On Jul 1, 2011, at 10:26 PM, alstonchris at netscape.net wrote:
> 
>> Folks
>> 
>> As long as we are on the subject, does anyone know if there is a DVD
(preferably digitally-remastered) of the famous movie about the accident?  I
have no problem paying a reasonable charge.  It is something that every HP
really should have on her/his shelves, no?
>> 
>> 
>> Cheers
>> cja
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Jaro Franta <jaro-10kbq at sympatico.ca>
>> To: 'The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) Mailing
List' <radsafe at health.phys.iit.edu>
>> Sent: Tue, Jun 21, 2011 8:11 pm
>> Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] SL1
>> 
>> 
>> Hi Spencer,
>> 
>> INL's on-line history book has a detailed (9.3MB pdf) account of SL-1 in
>> chapter 15:
>> 
>> http://www.inl.gov/proving-the-principle/chapter_15.pdf
>> 
>> Jaro
>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> (AECL Montreal office)
>> 
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu
>> [mailto:radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu] On Behalf Of
SFisher373 at aol.com
>> Sent: June-21-11 7:24 PM
>> To: radsafe at health.phys.iit.edu
>> Subject: [ RadSafe ] SL1
>> 
>> Franz et al,
>> I would say that sabotage is not the correct word to use.  We present
the 
>> SL1 accident to our students, and I have read the reports, investigations

>> etc.  I am at home, so do not have the facts in front of me.  What
happened
>> 
>> was that contrary to what was posted yesterday, they were working on  the

>> control rods, not the fuel rods.  The central rod controlled 80% of the  
>> reactor power.  The work involved stroking the control rods.  For some
>> reason, 
>> unknown, the one individual removed the control rod.  He had broken  up
with
>> 
>> his wife on the day of the incident and had his personal belongings in
the 
>> car.  So was he distracted, was he trying to injure himself to get  
>> sympathy, was it a murder/suicide (he felt that his wife may have been
>> cheating  
>> with the other operator on duty that day).  This was after the Christmas

>> holidays/New Year.  
>> 
>> The magnitude of the excursion was greater than had been predicted.
There 
>> are accounts that since this was a military reactor, it was known that  
>> removing the central rod would cause the reactor to overheat and be
>> damaged.  
>> What happened was the water turned to steam and the resulting  steam
hammer 
>> produced an effect far greater than predicted.
>> 
>> So it was a human problem, and since no one lived, we will never  know.  
>> 
>> Spencer M. Fisher
>> Nuclear Theory and Reactor Physics
>> Authorization Training
>> Ontario Power Generation.
>> _______________________________________________
>> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
>> 
>> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood
the
>> RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
>> http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
>> 
>> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
visit:
>> http://health.phys.iit.edu
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
>> 
>> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood
the 
>> RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
>> 
>> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
visit: 
>> http://health.phys.iit.edu
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
>> 
>> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood
the RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
>> 
>> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu
_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list

Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the
RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html

For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit:
http://health.phys.iit.edu



More information about the RadSafe mailing list