[ RadSafe ] SL1 Accident Video
alstonchris at netscape.net
alstonchris at netscape.net
Tue Jul 5 19:11:50 CDT 2011
Ladies and Gents
David's suggestion of the archive.org site is hugely useful. For one thing, it is just a great site, a veritable cornucopia. Specifically, the SL-1 videos, to which it hyperlinks, are offered by the NTIS. So, yes, these are the real things. You have a nice choice of file formats (and file sizes) from which to choose.
Cheers
cja
-----Original Message-----
From: David Matchick <dmatch at prolog.net>
To: alstonchris <alstonchris at netscape.net>
Cc: terryj <terryj at iit.edu>
Sent: Sat, Jul 2, 2011 9:03 am
Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] SL1 Accident Video
Mr. Alston,
The SL-1 accident film is also available by video download (for free)
from www.archive.org. From what I recall it is the original SL-1 film
at this link:
http://www.archive.org/details/gov.ntis.A13886VNB1
Sincerely,
David Matchick
On 7/1/2011 11:26 PM, alstonchris at netscape.net wrote:
> Folks
>
> As long as we are on the subject, does anyone know if there is a DVD
(preferably digitally-remastered) of the famous movie about the accident? I
have no problem paying a reasonable charge. It is something that every HP
really should have on her/his shelves, no?
>
>
> Cheers
> cja
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jaro Franta<jaro-10kbq at sympatico.ca>
> To: 'The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) Mailing
List'<radsafe at health.phys.iit.edu>
> Sent: Tue, Jun 21, 2011 8:11 pm
> Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] SL1
>
>
> Hi Spencer,
>
> INL's on-line history book has a detailed (9.3MB pdf) account of SL-1 in
> chapter 15:
>
> http://www.inl.gov/proving-the-principle/chapter_15.pdf
>
> Jaro
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> (AECL Montreal office)
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu
> [mailto:radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu] On Behalf Of SFisher373 at aol.com
> Sent: June-21-11 7:24 PM
> To: radsafe at health.phys.iit.edu
> Subject: [ RadSafe ] SL1
>
> Franz et al,
> I would say that sabotage is not the correct word to use. We present the
> SL1 accident to our students, and I have read the reports, investigations
> etc. I am at home, so do not have the facts in front of me. What happened
>
> was that contrary to what was posted yesterday, they were working on the
> control rods, not the fuel rods. The central rod controlled 80% of the
> reactor power. The work involved stroking the control rods. For some
> reason,
> unknown, the one individual removed the control rod. He had broken up with
>
> his wife on the day of the incident and had his personal belongings in the
> car. So was he distracted, was he trying to injure himself to get
> sympathy, was it a murder/suicide (he felt that his wife may have been
> cheating
> with the other operator on duty that day). This was after the Christmas
> holidays/New Year.
>
> The magnitude of the excursion was greater than had been predicted. There
> are accounts that since this was a military reactor, it was known that
> removing the central rod would cause the reactor to overheat and be
> damaged.
> What happened was the water turned to steam and the resulting steam hammer
> produced an effect far greater than predicted.
>
> So it was a human problem, and since no one lived, we will never know.
>
> Spencer M. Fisher
> Nuclear Theory and Reactor Physics
> Authorization Training
> Ontario Power Generation.
> _______________________________________________
> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
>
> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the
> RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
> http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
>
> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit:
> http://health.phys.iit.edu
>
>
>
More information about the RadSafe
mailing list