[ RadSafe ] Help! <Help is needed!

[franz.schoenhofer at chello.at]

RADSAFERs

I ask for your help! I recently read on a RADSAFE message, that the word "nonsense" is not acceptable on RADSAFE. I notice that anything that had been previously characterized by this word, distributed by a Raman Spectroscopist is forwarded without delay, while critical comments by those who have worked in that field as professionals for decades are either delayed or are blocked completely. 

As a non native speaker I ask for your help to tell me, how to characterize in words acceptable by the moderator the "contributions" by the Raman Spetroscopist Chris Busby. Additionally I would like to know about the rules of conduct - it is annoying to write a long contribution only to learn days later that it has not been forwarded (without notice).

I hope that this attempt to satisfy some unknown code of conduct will be accepted and look forward to a comprehensive answer. . 

Best regards,

Franz


---- Jeff Terry <terryj at iit.edu> schrieb:
> Many books are often cited as references. 
> 
> That said, non-peer reviewed work may not be as reliable as peer reviewed works. 
> I try to avoid referencing non-peer reviewed work, but I have referenced textbooks. 
> 
> It is up to the reader to evaluate the veracity of sources. Often, clues can be garnered from the title of a reference. 
> 
> Jeff
> 
> Sent from my iPad
> _______________________________________________
> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
> 
> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at: http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
> 
> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu

--
Franz Schoenhofer, PhD, MinRat
Habicherg. 31/7
A-1160 Vienna
Austria
mobile: ++43 699 1706 1227