[ RadSafe ] Smart meters

[Brent Rogers]

My power bill is based on what time-of-day I use it, and the bills are significantly (at least 25%) lower.  There was a startup cost, to install a 2nd meter, but well worth it.

Brent Rogers
Sydney Australia



Sent from my iPad

On 03/06/2011, at 5:51, "Emer, Dudley (CONTR)" <EMERDF at nv.doe.gov> wrote:

> http://www.sdge.com/documents/smartmeter/EPRI_1022270.pdf
> 
> The real problem for the user won't be cancer from the RF but a heart attack from the power bill when utilities start charging you on a tiered hourly basis rather than a fixed-price monthly integral.
> 
> 
> Dudley Emer
> Geophysicist
> National Security Technologies (NSTec)
> National Center for Nuclear Security 
> Nevada National Security Site, Mercury, Nv
> US DOE Contractor
> 702-295-7808 office
> 702-794-5824 pager
> 702-343-6208 cell
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu [mailto:radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu] On Behalf Of sent
> Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2011 12:33 PM
> To: radsafe at health.phys.iit.edu
> Subject: [ RadSafe ] Smart meters
> 
> I hope that someone on the list who is more knowledgeable than I about the new wireless electric metering technology can provide a comment about the claims of harm made on the website:
> 
> http://www.smartmeterdangers.org/
> 
> This method of providing electric use date is replacing the traditional monthly personal visit by a meter reading person, obviously a significant cost saver for a utility.
> 
> Robert Barish, PhD CHP
> 
> _______________________________________________
> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
> 
> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at: http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
> 
> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu