[ RadSafe ] How many curies were involved in Hiroshima
sjd at swcp.com
Wed Jun 22 10:15:39 CDT 2011
I have already answered your trashy "meta analysis" of
infant leukemia in the aftermath of Chernobyl. For all practical
purposes, you ignored it.
Tondel's study is junk. Give us an English-language link or
citation to the KiKK study. (Har, har. As if you would ever
condescend to provide a link or a citation.) For you, Chris, links
and citations are "not science." Are they?
At 08:11 AM 6/22/2011, you wrote:
>The easy way out is to discount any study that you dont agree with
>as not being credible.
>There really is no answer to that.
>Thats what UNSCEAR do, ignore any study that disagrees wth their position.
>But thats not science.
>And why, for example, is my meta analysis study of infant leukemias
>after Chernobyl not credible?
>I cant remember you answering that question way back when I started
>And Tondel's study of Sweden after Chernobyl?
>Or the many studies of nuclear site child leukemias? e.g. KiKK.
>There are plenty more.
>But I think you will just have to wait now for the Fukushima deaths.
More information about the RadSafe