[ RadSafe ] How many curies were involved in Hiroshima

Steven Dapra sjd at swcp.com
Wed Jun 22 10:15:39 CDT 2011

June 22

         I have already answered your trashy "meta analysis" of 
infant leukemia in the aftermath of Chernobyl.  For all practical 
purposes, you ignored it.

         Tondel's study is junk.  Give us an English-language link or 
citation to the KiKK study.  (Har, har.  As if you would ever 
condescend to provide a link or a citation.)  For you, Chris, links 
and citations are "not science."  Are they?

Steven Dapra

At 08:11 AM 6/22/2011, you wrote:

>The easy way out is to discount any study that you dont agree with 
>as not being credible.
>There really is no answer to that.
>Thats what UNSCEAR do, ignore any study that disagrees wth their position.
>But thats not science.
>And why, for example, is my meta analysis study of infant leukemias 
>after Chernobyl not credible?
>I cant remember you answering that question way back when I started 
>this discourse?
>And Tondel's study of Sweden after Chernobyl?
>Or the many studies of nuclear site child leukemias? e.g. KiKK.
>There are plenty more.
>But I think you will just have to wait now for the Fukushima deaths.


More information about the RadSafe mailing list