[ RadSafe ] How many curies were involved in Hiroshima

[franz.schoenhofer at chello.at]

Chris,

Your method to confuse RADSAFE with repeating again and again dozens of mails is well known, but it is annoying - which is obviously what it should be according to your tactics. 

You base your comment on some "anticipated" deaths, which have not yet occurred and will most probably never occur, in analogue to Chernobyl. This is not science and not worth "one of the best epidemiologists and the most knowledgable person on radioecology, radioactivity, and nuclear accidents in the world". You present your own personal speculations as facts. This is highly unethical, respecially when it is associated with money to be earned. 

Best regards,

Franz. 

 According to good practice I removed all your kB of repeated mails to make mine reasable.    



---- "Busby schrieb:
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: radsafe-bounces at agni.phys.iit.edu on behalf of Dustin G. Miller
> Sent: Wed 22/06/2011 19:39
> To: 'The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) Mailing	List'
> Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] How many curies were involved in Hiroshima
>  
> Why would you attribute all increased deaths/cancer incidence/infant
> mortality to the exposures?  There is more happening to the people in
> Fukushima than exposure to radioactive materials.  With the tsunami, I would
> assume the following could increase the death/cancer incidence/infant
> mortality in the area