[ RadSafe ] NOT PROFESSIONAL! THIS IS ACCEPTABLE TO GROUP OF RADSAFE??
sjd at swcp.com
Fri Jun 24 11:58:37 CDT 2011
Okay, okay. I was indulging myself in a bit of
sarcasm. Imitating Busby perhaps?
At 09:14 AM 6/24/2011, you wrote:
>Proper and professional? No
>Acceptable as it stands now? Maybe, to some
>Surprising at this point?
>No, RadSafe has degraded to a chat room most of the time. The scientific
>content is vanishingly small. Conjecture, speculation, pointless political
>meanderings, personal attacks, and straight-out vilification dominate. The
>vast majority of posts seem to originate with a small fraction of the
>members. Are all the others disgusted? I hold out a sliver of hope for a
>return to serious discussions of substance, but it's getting easier to
>delete whole streams of posts from my Inbox unread. I don't have the time,
>but there are some who obviously do . . . . .
>David L. North, Sc.M., DABR
>Main Building, Rm 317
>Rhode Island Hospital
>593 Eddy St.
>Providence, RI 02903
>f: (401) 444-4446
>dnorth at lifespan.org
>On 6/24/11 1:00 AM, "RRGWNYEnviro at aol.com" <RRGWNYEnviro at aol.com> wrote:
> > NOT PROFESSIONAL!
> > THIS IS ACCEPTABLE TO GROUP OF RADSAFE?
> > ----
> > "You have a girlfriend? At your
> > age? Let's see a picture of her. Or will you make that up on photoshop
> > too?"
> > Steven Dapra
More information about the RadSafe