[ RadSafe ] NOT PROFESSIONAL! THIS IS ACCEPTABLE TO GROUP OF RADSAFE??

[North, David]

Proper and professional?   No

Acceptable as it stands now?   Maybe, to some

Surprising at this point?

No, RadSafe has degraded to a chat room most of the time. The scientific
content is vanishingly small. Conjecture, speculation, pointless political
meanderings, personal attacks, and straight-out vilification dominate. The
vast majority of posts seem to originate with a small fraction of the
members. Are all the others disgusted? I hold out a sliver of hope for a
return to serious discussions of substance, but it's getting easier to
delete whole streams of posts from my Inbox unread. I don't have the time,
but there are some who obviously do . . . . .

David L. North, Sc.M., DABR
Associate Physicist
Main Building, Rm 317
Rhode Island Hospital
593 Eddy St.
Providence, RI 02903
w: (401)444-5961
f: (401) 444-4446
dnorth at lifespan.org




On 6/24/11 1:00 AM, "RRGWNYEnviro at aol.com" <RRGWNYEnviro at aol.com> wrote:

> NOT PROFESSIONAL!
> THIS IS ACCEPTABLE TO GROUP OF RADSAFE?
>  
>  
> ----
> "You have a girlfriend?  At your
> age?  Let's see a picture of  her.  Or will you make that up on photoshop
> too?"
> 
> Steven Dapra
> ----
> 
> 
> PLEASE this is NOT helpful to understanding helath physics of Japan or
> anyplace.
> Why this thing be allowed now on constant all the  time?
> _______________________________________________
> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
> 
> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the
> RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
> http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
> 
> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit:
> http://health.phys.iit.edu