[ RadSafe ] [Bulk] Ft. Calhoun
Brennan, Mike (DOH)
Mike.Brennan at DOH.WA.GOV
Mon Jun 27 17:15:48 CDT 2011
I didn't say it was a good idea...
On the other hand, it would be less of an issue for the spent fuel pool. And it really beats saltwater.
From: radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu [mailto:radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu] On Behalf Of Ahmad Al-Ani
Sent: Monday, June 27, 2011 1:35 PM
To: The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) Mailing List
Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] [Bulk] Ft. Calhoun
Any impurities in the water would compromise future operation as well as decommissioning.
That's why the US navy provided barges of fresh water to Fukushima reactors early on in the emergency phase.
>From: "Brennan, Mike (DOH)" <Mike.Brennan at DOH.WA.GOV>
>To: The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) MailingList <radsafe at health.phys.iit.edu>
>Sent: Monday, June 27, 2011 8:12 PM
>Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] [Bulk] Ft. Calhoun
>And, on the bright side, there is no shortage of fresh water, though the sediment might be a problem.
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at: http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu
More information about the RadSafe