[ RadSafe ] NRC Press Release and suggested PAGs
Jerry Cohen
jjc105 at yahoo.com
Wed Mar 16 15:46:22 CDT 2011
It might be interesting to know the assumptions behind these calculations. Is it
possible that the NRC might be unreasonable (excessively conservative)? Heaven
forbid!
Jerry Cohen
________________________________
From: "Egidi, Phil" <Phil.Egidi at dphe.state.co.us>
To: The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) Mailing List
<radsafe at health.phys.iit.edu>
Sent: Wed, March 16, 2011 12:58:35 PM
Subject: [ RadSafe ] NRC Press Release and suggested PAGs
It is suggested one look at the most recent NRC press release and accompanying
modeling with respect to suggested PAGS for US Citizens in Japan. The numerical
values postulated are sobering...
http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/news/2011/11-050_Attchmt.pdf
http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/news/2011/11-050.pdf
Phil Egidi
CDPHE
_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the
RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit:
http://health.phys.iit.edu
More information about the RadSafe
mailing list