[ RadSafe ] NRC Press Release and suggested PAGs

Jerry Cohen jjc105 at yahoo.com
Wed Mar 16 15:46:22 CDT 2011


It might be interesting to know the assumptions behind these calculations. Is it 
possible that the NRC might be unreasonable (excessively conservative)? Heaven 
forbid!
Jerry Cohen



________________________________
From: "Egidi, Phil" <Phil.Egidi at dphe.state.co.us>
To: The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) Mailing List 
<radsafe at health.phys.iit.edu>
Sent: Wed, March 16, 2011 12:58:35 PM
Subject: [ RadSafe ] NRC Press Release and suggested PAGs


It is suggested one look at the most recent NRC press release and accompanying 
modeling with respect to suggested PAGS for US Citizens in Japan.  The numerical 
values postulated are sobering...

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/news/2011/11-050_Attchmt.pdf 

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/news/2011/11-050.pdf 


Phil Egidi
CDPHE
_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list

Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the 
RadSafe rules. These can be found at: 
http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html

For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit: 
http://health.phys.iit.edu


More information about the RadSafe mailing list