[ RadSafe ] xkcd: Relative Radiation Dose chart

Sandra Matzkin matzkin at invap.com.ar
Mon Mar 21 13:37:40 CDT 2011


About the assertion "Lowest one-year dose clearly linked to increased 
cancer risk" (100 mSv), can anyone comment or provide references on 
how this link was established?

Regards

Sandra Matzkin
Radiation Transport
INVAP SE
Bariloche
Argentina


At 02:30 PM 3/21/2011, Yoss, Robert wrote:
>For a chuckle note the last lines at the bottom.
>
>Rob Yoss
>FMLH/MCW
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu 
>[mailto:radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu] On Behalf Of Cary Renquist
>Sent: Monday, March 21, 2011 11:45 AM
>To: The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) MailingList
>Subject: [ RadSafe ] xkcd: Relative Radiation Dose chart
>
>Surprised that nobody has pointed this out yet...
>
>http://j.mp/fklO6J
>
>
>
>
>Best regards,
>Cary
>
>---
>Cary Renquist
>crenquist at isotopeproducts.com or cary.renquist at ezag.com
>
>_______________________________________________
>You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
>
>Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and 
>understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at: 
>http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
>
>For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other 
>settings visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu
>_______________________________________________
>You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
>
>Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and 
>understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at: 
>http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
>
>For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other 
>settings visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu



More information about the RadSafe mailing list