[ RadSafe ] Busby: chemist or physicist?
sjd at swcp.com
Sun May 1 22:09:54 CDT 2011
Okay, Mr. CHEMICAL physicist. Besides, I did not call you a
physicist. The infowars.com web site that was fawning and simpering
over you called you a "physicist." Why don't you register a
complaint with your sycophants? By the way, how do you know there is
"a rage" in all those residents of Tokyo? Have you interviewed any of them?
You are not a nuclear physicist, nor are you an
epidemiologist, hence when you are spewing about power reactors and
epidemiology you are outside of your field, so big deal.
I think it's safe to assume that you are implying that
Fukushima will cause an *additional* 800,000 cancers. That claim is
a fraud and a hoax. But just to be reasonable about it, let's see
your "calculations," assuming that you can find the envelope upon
whose back you made them.
At 01:06 PM 5/1/2011, you wrote:
>My PhD is in Chemical PHYSICS
>From: radsafe-bounces at agni.phys.iit.edu on behalf of Steven Dapra
>Sent: Sat 30/04/2011 05:05
>To: radsafe at agni.phys.iit.edu
>Subject: [ RadSafe ] Busby: chemist or physicist?
> According to this hysterical and fear-mongering article, Chris Busby
>is a physicist. Here's the quote:
>"Dr. Chris Busby, another physicist says there is a rage in the
>people in Tokyo and he now predicts based on his calculations that
>800,000 people out of about 8 million who live within 200 kilomters
>[sic] of the plant will contract cancer if they are not moved out."
> Here's the link:
> Based on the size of the scroll bar it looks like a long
>article. Over three fourths of it is comments from readers. (The
>article is about 2400 words long.)
More information about the RadSafe