[ RadSafe ] The human sex odds at birth after theatmosphericatomic bomb tests, after Chernobyl, and in the vicinity of nuclear facilities

[franz.schoenhofer at chello.at]

Given the fact that ECRR is bogus - "European Commission" is something else and a regulatory body within the European Community contrary to your (Busby) private "company".  Eerything distributed by you on behalf of ECCR is automatically bogus and financed by some green groups, radical antinuclear groups like this international financial enterprise "Greenpeace" and others you might be surprised or not that your message is not taken serious. Since RADSAFE has unfortunately become almost a US-alone newsgroup you might find a willing audience, which takes you serious - we in Europe know, what we have to think of you and your fellow "experts" like this unbelievable expert "Schmitz-Feuerhake", on whose name, when mentioned among European radiation protection professionals causes a laugh - she is really ridiculous, has been removed as a presentator from conferences, especially since her "coauthors" refused to be named together with her, because they did not share her opinions. She is like Chris Busby a member of those "commissions", "Societies", "Institutes", which do not have any legal status, but use these labels only to give their agenda a credibility and to enhance donations. How dispisable!

There is more material for the future!

Best regards,

Franz

---- Busby Chris <C.Busby at ulster.aaaac.uk> schrieb:
> an ECRR member
> Chris
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: radsafe-bounces at agni.phys.iit.edu on behalf of Brennan, Mike  (DOH)
> Sent: Thu 26/05/2011 22:13
> To: The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) MailingList
> Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] The human sex odds at birth after the atmosphericatomic bomb tests, after Chernobyl,and in the vicinity of nuclear facilities
>  
> From the Medical Express article: " Their analyses show a significant
> gender gap in all three cases:"
> 
> I think "show" might be an overstatement.  "Suggests", or "implies"
> might be better.  There are a lot of ways of drawing lines through the
> points on the graphs, and coloration does not prove causality.  
> 
> Given the small changes in the ratios (1.055 to 1.047 male/female range
> in the US, for example), there are a lot of confounding factors I would
> want to see dealt with.  For example, it wouldn't take many abortions
> for sex selection to mess up the numbers (NOTE: I am not saying that is
> what happened, just using it as an example).  
> 
> This strikes me as a particularly easy thing to test with animal models,
> though I know that is more expensive than searching databases.  But I
> think I would want to see some animal testing and perhaps a model as to
> the mechanics of how it happens before I got too excited. 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu
> [mailto:radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu] On Behalf Of Doug Huffman
> Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2011 1:48 PM
> To: radsafe at health.phys.iit.edu
> Subject: [ RadSafe ] The human sex odds at birth after the atmospheric
> atomic bomb tests, after Chernobyl, and in the vicinity of nuclear
> facilities
> 
> http://www.springerlink.com/content/w822527526045772/
> 
> http://www.springerlink.com/content/w822527526045772/fulltext.pdf  free
> I think
> 
> Popularized review
> 
> http://medicalxpress.com/news/2011-05-nuclear-affects-baby-gender.html
> _______________________________________________
> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
> 
> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood
> the RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
> http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
> 
> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
> visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu
> _______________________________________________
> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
> 
> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at: http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
> 
> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
> 
> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at: http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
> 
> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu

--
Franz Schoenhofer, PhD, MinRat
Habicherg. 31/7
A-1160 Vienna
Austria
mobile: ++43 699 1706 1227