[ RadSafe ] Climate change health effects costs - Nuclear Energy Benefit and magnitude of risk

[dckosloff at firstenergycorp.com]

Stewart,

For those with a strong drive (perceived need?) to gratify their egos, 
there is no such thing as PETTY ego gratification.  That is especially 
true when such folk have no other viable way of gratifying their egos.

I am a bit puzzled by your closing question.  Reality that has existed and 
continues to exist at this moment is certainly a possible thing.

Don Kosloff



From:   Stewart Farber <SAFarber at optonline.net>
To:     "'The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) Mailing 
List'" <radsafe at health.phys.iit.edu>
Date:   11/11/2011 03:47 PM
Subject:        [ RadSafe ] Climate change health effects costs - Nuclear 
Energy Benefit and magnitude of risk
Sent by:        radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu



Snipped

These extremist interests would have society 
squander over $1 trillion by shutting down a beneficial technology like 
today's worldwide nuclear electric generation capacity,  for their petty 
ego gratification and financial interests. Is such a thing possible?

Stewart Farber, MS Public Health




-----------------------------------------
The information contained in this message is intended only for the
personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If
the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an
agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you
are hereby notified that you have received this document in error
and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of
this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately, and delete
the original message.