[ RadSafe ] Neutron Bomb used on Fallujah

Tue Nov 29 06:48:38 CST 2011

This provides rather more believable understanding of the nature and
workings of a neutron bomb

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutron_bomb

Fred Dawson

-----Original Message-----
From: radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu
[mailto:radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu] On Behalf Of
franz.schoenhofer at chello.at
Sent: 29 November 2011 11:07
To: The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) Mailing List;
The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) MailingList
Cc: Busby, Chris
Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] Neutron Bomb used on Fallujah

Chris Busby,

Your messages to RADSAFE have been more than ridiculous, but now you are
exceeding your ridiculous messages by orders of magnitude. Why don't you try
to get medical help? "Red Mercury" - you are kidding. Your analyses by your
"laboratory" remain much more than suspicious. If this is in  your own words
just a suggestion and you even concide that you do not know about it, why do
you  post it to RADSAFE?

You seem not to have the dignity to stop your ridiculous and wrong messages
on RADSAFE.

Best regards to everybody on RADSAFE except the Raman Spectroscopist Chris
Busby.

Franz

. 
> The neutron bomb is not a conventional one. It uses cold fusion through
deuterium dissolved in uranium which when supersaturated by compression
causes fusion. The method was developed following the Fleischmann discovery
using Palladium electrodes, but uranium is better. It is a small device, as
small as a baseball. The Russians called it Red Mercury and described its
characteristics. 
> But this was only a suggestion. I do not know. All I know is that there is
slightly enriched uranium in Fallujah and also in the Lebanon bomb crater
from Khiam.
> Thank you
> Chris
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> From: radsafe-bounces at agni.phys.iit.edu on behalf of Brennan, Mike (DOH)
> Sent: Mon 28/11/2011 22:19
> To: The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) MailingList
> Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] Neutron Bomb used on Fallujah
> 
> 
> 
> Thank you for your kind words. 
> 
> Another argument against the claim that a neutron weapon was used in
> Fallujah is that I suspect all versions of enhanced radiation weapons
> (neutron bombs) use plutonium, rather than highly enriched uranium.  At
> very least the one description that I found in a quick look mentioned
> using plutonium, and it fits with other things I know about such
> weapons.  If that is the case, a neutron bomb as the source of U235 is
> even more difficult to accept. 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu
> [mailto:radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu] On Behalf Of
> alstonchris at netscape.net
> Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2011 4:12 PM
> To: radsafe at health.phys.iit.edu
> Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] Neutron Bomb used on Fallujah
> 
> 
> Mike
> 
> 
> Thanks for your usual calm, well informed, and carefully considered
> discussion of the matter.  I might only add that the article is really
> baffling in that it refers to the U in question as being simultaneously
> "weapons-grade" and "slightly enriched".  These are mutually exclusive
> characterizations.
> 
> 
> 
> Cheers
> cja
> 
>  > It is sad that people who promote this kind of thing don't bother to>
> google what they are talking about.  A "neutron bomb" isn't some magic>
> people-killing-building-leaving device; it is a low yield nuclear>
> weapon, optimized for neutron production.  If one had been set off in>
> Fallujah, everyone who was interested would have known about it, and
> the> evidence would be incontrovertible.>> The first clues would have
> been pretty distinctive: the mushroom cloud,> really, REALLY loud
> explosion and flash (even compared to the other> explosions and flashes)
> and an electro-magnetic pulse that would have> fried most electronics
> for miles around.  Given that almost every> American in the area was
> carrying some personal electronics such as cell> phones, computers, GPS
> units, etc., if there had been an EMP, it would> have been noticed.
> Someone would have talked.  In addition to the US, I> would guess there
> are at least four countries with satellites that could> detect and
> identify t
>  he EMP from a nuke, and probably as many> corporations (and it may be
> as high as 10 countries).  There would also> be a fairly distinctive
> blast damage pattern at ground zero.>> Second, given the fairly short
> range of a neutron dose high enough to be> fatal in the short term (and
> if you are in the middle of a battle you> don't use thing with latency
> periods in years or decades, as you want to> kill your targets now, to
> make them stop shooting at you), the weapon> would have to be detonated
> fairly close to the ground.  This means LOTS> of fallout.  Easily
> detectable levels of short lived isotopes would have> been seen probably
> a couple thousand miles downwind.  No matter which> way the wind was
> blowing, there are countries that would be willing to> blow the whistle
> on the event.>> Third, one of the things about neutron bombs is high
> neutron flux in the> target area (that is the whole point, after all).
> High neutron flux> means lots of activation of material in that area,
> wit
>  h characteristic> isotopes.  A lot of them are short lived, but there
> would be enough to> increase the gamma background, and detectable with a
> hand held gamma> spec device for quite some time after.>> No, the best
> explanation for finding U235 in samples is that it is> naturally
> occurring.> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
> 
> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood
> the RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
> http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
> 
> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
> visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu <http://health.phys.iit.edu/> 
> _______________________________________________
> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
> 
> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood
the RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
> 
> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu <http://health.phys.iit.edu/> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
> 
> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood
the RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
> 
> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu

--
Franz Schoenhofer, PhD, MinRat
Habicherg. 31/7
A-1160 Vienna
Austria
mobile: ++43 699 1706 1227

_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list

Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the
RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html

For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit:
http://health.phys.iit.edu