[ RadSafe ] Rational Thought

[franz.schoenhofer at chello.at]

Chris, 

Could you refrain from trying to ridicule me - I think that is not only against the normal conduct in the Internet, but strictly against RADSAFE rule. I have been working in the field for decades, have extensive knowledge on the Chernolbyl accident, on worldwide nuclear explosions and their effects. 

You need not belittle my knowledge. It would be rather appropriate to question your non existing knowledge, which you demonstrate with your funny mails. Your insults are not entertaining, but revealing your agenda and your lack of knowledge.

Franz


---- "Busby schrieb:
> Franz,
> It is not obvious to me from any of your emails that you know anything much at all.
> Since the wind energy is free any loss of efficiency has to be considered in that context. What is the efficiency of a sailing yacht? It gets you from A to B without any outlay on fuel. What, for example is the efficiency of nuclear power? A meaningless question. And if you bring in all the cancer children near the nuclear sites, the disposal of the waste etc., its efficiency is probably negative.  The efficiency of hydrogen production from electrolysis is very high. The efficiency of burning hydrogen in a heat engine is Carnot-based dQ/T.  What you may like to know is that I am a Physical Chemist and Chemical Physicist, was responsible at Wellcome for and was the expert on Thermodynamics, I also ran the electrochemical laboratory and my 2nd PhD was in Raman Spectroelectrochemistry. I am sorry that I know so much, but that's not my problem, its just a consequence of much study and hard work in many areas.
> I do enjoy our little exchanges. Keep up the insults. Most entertaining.
> Best regards
> Chris
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: radsafe-bounces at agni.phys.iit.edu on behalf of franz.schoenhofer at chello.at
> Sent: Tue 04/10/2011 13:05