[ RadSafe ] RadSafe Digest, Vol 764, Issue 3
Steven Dapra
sjd at swcp.com
Thu Oct 6 19:50:40 CDT 2011
Oct. 6
You forgot the citation to your "enormously complicated and
expensive study."
Steven Dapra
At 11:40 AM 10/6/2011, you wrote:
>I agree about peer review and dont rely on it, nor do I say that my
>own peer review articles are any more believable as a result of peer
>review. Its it is just that others demand this as some kind of
>requirement before they even read it. I have been contacted by many
>people in Japan giving symptoms that suggest the same scenario as
>Bandashevsky found. I figured out that it was mechanistically
>plausible, and this made me realise that i could save lives. Hence
>Youtube. I recently did an enormously complicated and expensive
>study of uranium in Fallujah. It took almost a year to get through
>peer review. Its now published. In that time, a lot of children
>could have been saved. Scientists like anyone have a duty to warn
>the public of what they have found if that can possible save
>lives.It would, in my opinion and belief, have been irresponsible
>NOT to say something to everyone.
>Cheers
>Chris
[edit]
More information about the RadSafe
mailing list