[ RadSafe ] Drawing the line betweenscience>andpseudo-science. (was Rational Thought) >Roger Helbig

[franz.schoenhofer at chello.at]

John,

Why do you direct this request to RADSAFE? Who started this whole mess? Why should we accept all his nonsense without reacting to it? This person is a persona non grata in science, there was not a single post on RADSAFE to defend or support his opinions. Every day his (according to my dictionary) wish-wash, hot air, palaver - native speakers please chose the appropriate word - is provocating, as it is intended by the classical trolls and directed towards blocking the group. 

I do not think that we have to accept the behaviour of this "professor", "highly qualified radiation expert" bla, bla, bla, and his insults, his personal attacks. Therefore we should be able to counter his nonsense.

Anyhow - best regard,

Franz


 


---- "Dixon schrieb:
> All,
> Please stop this thread. I received over 70 messages in one day due to this thread. 
>
> John Dixon
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu [mailto:radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu] On Behalf Of Busby, Chris
> Sent: Friday, October 07, 2011 9:43 AM
> To: The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) Mailing List; The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) MailingList
> Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] Drawing the line between science>andpseudo-science. (was Rational Thought) >Roger Helbig
> 
> Dear Franz and other Radsafers
> 
> Here are more antics from your colleague Roger Helbig.
> Here Helbig chortles at his having stopped another article of mine by bullying the editors.
> Is this how scientists operate? But Helbig is an ex USAF colonel with a very diouibtfl history: what is he doing on RADSAFE? No qualifications, no work in the area, how did he get to be here? Pantagon black ops? Who knows? This is a serious question.
> This editor ignored Helbig and so should you. 
> 
> Cheers
> Chris 
> 
> 
> ==============================================
> 
> Editor in Chief
> Conflict and Health
> www.conflictandhealth.com
> 
> 
> 
> Question/Comment:
> 
> Dear Sir,
> 
> Your on-line journal has published an article by Christopher Busby and others that is full of false and misleading information and I want to know how this was thoroughly peer reviewed.  I personally stopped the publication of this in another Swiss journal after I contacted the American Editor-in-Chief about another questionable Busby inspired article.  True science is not political and one of the authors sole qualification is that he is an Iraqi member of the Brussels Tribunal kangaroo court.  I would hope that your journal values its integrity more than this.
> 
> Thank you.
> 
> <helbig.doc>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
> 
> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at: http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
> 
> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu
> _______________________________________________
> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
> 
> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at: http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
> 
> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu

--
Franz Schoenhofer, PhD, MinRat
Habicherg. 31/7
A-1160 Vienna
Austria
mobile: ++43 699 1706 1227