[ RadSafe ] Busby is a waste of bandwidth; from busby

[Busby, Chris]

This is a study by the National Radiological Protection Board and I dont believe it any more than the others they cobble together like the Second Event one also by AA Edwards.  They are a bunch of crooks. I have sent for the full paper.
Chris


-----Original Message-----
From: radsafe-bounces at agni.phys.iit.edu on behalf of Bjorn Cedervall
Sent: Sat 29/10/2011 11:46
To: RadSafers Forum; radsafe at agni.phys.iit.edu
Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] Busby is a waste of bandwidth; from busby
 

The Radiat. Res. paper referred to below was adressed in another study published in 2001 (Lloyd et al., Radiat. Res., Vol. 155, pp.809-817): A study to verify a reported excess of chromosomal aberrations in blood lymphocytes of Namibian uranium miners.
 
The last two sentences in the summary of this analysis are:
 
"The overall conclusion is that the frequency of chromosomal damage in the miners did not exceed that in the controls. Therefore, the result of the earlier study [Zaire et al.] was not confirmed."
 
My personal initiative only,
 
Bjorn Cedervall
 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

> Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2011 10:39:10 +0100
> From: C.Busby at ulster.ac.uk
> To: radsafe at agni.phys.iit.edu; radsafe at agni.phys.iit.edu
> Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] Busby is a waste of bandwidth; from busby
> 
> 
> 
> Zaire R, Notter M, Riedel W, Thiel E, (1997) Unexpected rates of chromosome instabilities and alterations of hormone levels in Namibian Uranium miners Radiation Research 147 579-584.
> 
> How about that one?
> 
> Sincerely
> Chris
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: radsafe-bounces at agni.phys.iit.edu on behalf of Mark Sonter
> Sent: Fri 28/10/2011 23:59
> To: radsafe at agni.phys.iit.edu
> Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] Busby is a waste of bandwidth
> 
> Dear Radsafers,
> 
> I am so fed up with this thread and Busby's weird new weapon coverup 
> fantasies. It is a waste of time.
> 
> Uranium is present in all soils, at something like 3 ppm +/- a factor of 
> 10 or more.
> 
> Uranium mill workers over the last half century don't show genetic 
> problems and I bet they have ingested / inhaled similar or indeed much 
> more than Chris's subjects.
> 
> DU *must* be toxicologically identical to nonD-U.
> 
> Let's have a bit of common sense here...
> 
> Can the moderator please call a halt to this pointless debate??
> 
> 
> Mark Sonter
> 
> Radiation Advice & Solutions Pty Ltd, abn 31 891 761 435
> Asteroid Enterprises Pty Ltd, abn 53 008 115 302
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
> 
> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at: http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
> 
> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
> 
> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at: http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
> 
> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu
 		 	   		  
_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list

Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at: http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html

For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu