[ RadSafe ] Polonium-210 poisoning

Baumbaugh, Joel T CIV SPAWARSYSCEN-PACIFIC, 55360 joel.baumbaugh at navy.mil
Mon Sep 12 11:25:38 CDT 2011


PLEASE take this disagreement off-line... Please.....  You both have
interesting posts when not "at war" w/each other. I'd hate to have to
block all of your email messages because of this obvious feud you two
have going on...


Joel Baumbaugh

-----Original Message-----


How about doing some literature research - 
Radiums, 228 I think" -this is sound science? 

Best regards to RADSAFErs, but not to Chris Busby


---- "Busby schrieb:
> Well they originally thought it was Tl206, which has that big gamma 
> line up in the 2.2MeV region because there was some weak gamma, thats 
> the decay series of one of the Radiums, 228 I think. That would fit 
> with a kitchen operation. But I didnt hear about any reactor gamma 
> nuclide. This is from memory but its one of the Tl s Chris
> -----Original Message-----
> From: radsafe-bounces at agni.phys.iit.edu on behalf of Mark Ramsay
> Sent: Sun 9/11/2011 2:20 PM
> To: The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) Mailing 
> List
> Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] Polonium-210 poisoning
> Do I not recall some gamma spec (yes gamma) was done which linked it
to reactor based production (based on impurities) ?
> Rgs
> Mark

More information about the RadSafe mailing list