[ RadSafe ] Legal Complaint of Navy Sailors

[Barbara Hamrick]

I wouldn't be too quick to jump to conclusions.  I doubt that evidence would make it thru a Daubert hearing, which is before the judge only, and rules on whether the scientific theory put forth is credible.

Barbara L. Hamrick 
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

-----Original Message-----
From: "Perle, Sandy" <sperle at mirion.com>
Sender: radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2012 19:22:35 
To: The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) Mailing List<radsafe at health.phys.iit.edu>
Reply-To: "The International Radiation Protection \(Health Physics\) Mailing
	List" <radsafe at health.phys.iit.edu>
Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] Legal Complaint of Navy Sailors

Ted, you are unfortunately correct, and when they collect, more lawsuits will be filed.

Regards,

Sandy Perle
Sent from my iPhone

On Dec 30, 2012, at 1:43 PM, "Ted de Castro" <tdc at xrayted.com> wrote:

> He doesn't have to convince the HPS - just 12 people who couldn't figure a way out of jury duty and are used to making decisions based on sound bites and knee jerk emotional reactions!
> 
> As little as he knows - The jurors will know far less - and any potential juror who shows any hint of knowing anything more and/or not fitting the profile above - will be rejected.
> 
> In other words - looks like his case/arguments are right on track - he seems to know what he's doing.
> 
> Sad!
> 
> 
> On 12/30/2012 2:16 AM, Roger Helbig wrote:
>> The lawyer could use a lot more education.  In addition to citing such
>> eminent experts as Ernest Sternglass and Arnold Gundersen and using
>> ENENews as if it were a peer reviewed scientific publication instead
>> of an on-line anti-nuclear screed, he makes the following statement on
>> page 8 of the complaint:
>> 
>> "39.  Radiation does not readily break down and biodegrade in the
>> ground or water or apparatus exposed to it.  Research now shows that
>> it will persist in the environment for decades, since it has a
>> half-life in excess of 77 years, far longer than the life expectancy
>> of humans exposed to it."
>> 
>> This makes it pretty clear that this hot shot lawyer does not have a
>> clue what he is talking about.
>> 
>> Roger Helbig
>> _______________________________________________
>> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
>> 
>> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at: http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
>> 
>> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu
> 
> _______________________________________________
> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
> 
> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at: http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
> 
> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu
_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list

Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at: http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html

For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu