No subject

tion>,
search <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troll_(Internet)#p-search>
This article is about internet slang. For other uses, see Troll
(disambiguation) <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troll_(disambiguation)>.
 <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Protection_policy#semi>
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Troll_Face_-_Internet_Meme,_May_2013.png=
>
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Troll_Face_-_Internet_Meme,_May_2013.png=
>
The "trollface" is occasionally used to indicate trolling in Internet
culture.[1] <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troll_(Internet)#cite_note-1>[2]<=
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troll_(Internet)#cite_note-2>
[3] <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troll_(Internet)#cite_note-3>

In Internet slang <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_slang>, a *troll* =
(
pron.: / <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:IPA_for_English>=CB=88<http://e=
n.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:IPA_for_English#Key>
t <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:IPA_for_English#Key>r<http://en.wikipe=
dia.org/wiki/Help:IPA_for_English#Key>
o=CA=8A <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:IPA_for_English#Key>l<http://en.=
wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:IPA_for_English#Key>
/ <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:IPA_for_English>,
/<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:IPA_for_English>
=CB=88 <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:IPA_for_English#Key>t<http://en.w=
ikipedia.org/wiki/Help:IPA_for_English#Key>
r <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:IPA_for_English#Key>=C9=92<http://en.w=
ikipedia.org/wiki/Help:IPA_for_English#Key>
l <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:IPA_for_English#Key>/<http://en.wikipe=
dia.org/wiki/Help:IPA_for_English>)
is someone who posts
inflammatory,[4]<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troll_(Internet)#cite_note-4>
extraneous <http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/extraneous#Adjective>, or
off-topic <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Off-topic> messages in an online
community, such as a forum, chat room, or blog, with the primary intent of
provoking readers into an emotional
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emotion>response
[5] <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troll_(Internet)#cite_note-PCMAG_def-5>or
of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion.
[6] <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troll_(Internet)#cite_note-IUKB_def-6>The
noun
*troll* may also refer to the provocative message itself, as in: "That was
an excellent troll you posted."

While the word *troll* and its associated verb *trolling* are associated
with Internet discourse, media attention in recent years has made such
labels subjective <http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/subjective#English>, with
trolling describing intentionally provocative actions and
harassment<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harassment> outside
of an online context. For example, mass media has used *troll* to describe
"a person who defaces Internet tribute sites with the aim of causing grief
to families."[7] <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troll_(Internet)#cite_note-7=
>
[8]<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troll_(Internet)#cite_note-Trolling:TheTod=
ayShowExplorestheDarkSideoftheInternet-8>


On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Franz Sch=C3=B6nhofer <
franz.schoenhofer at chello.at> wrote:

> Roy,
>
> I think I mentioned already that I have been always very interested in
> anything nuclear including weapons. I have read and I do not doubt that t=
he
> devastation of Dresden using conventional weapons was at least as effecti=
ve
> as the nuclear bombings in Japan, but overall cheaper. How cynical! I hav=
e
> also read about the original plans to bomb Kyoto. I have also been in Kyo=
to
> a few times (BTW I need not justify my visits to whereever I go, Mr.
> Troll!!!!!) and this would have been a really extraordinary crime and a
> slap into the face of culture. My suspicion is however that this target w=
as
> simply impractical, because it would have been much to far away from the =
US
> Airforce base where the Enola Gay and the Bockscar started from. I agree
> with your last remark. The damage done in Europe during the war is
> unimaginable for non-Europeans. Dresden has been reconstructed more or le=
ss
> in a modern way, but the historical buildings have all been restored in
> their original shape, the last ones being the cathedral and the historica=
l
> castle which houses again the old treasures. I remember that some 20 or 3=
0
> years ago a lot of devastation was still to be seen.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Franz
>
>
>
> -----Urspr=C3=BCngliche Nachricht----- From: ROY HERREN
> Sent: Monday, May 20, 2013 6:33 AM
>
> To: The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] Re-settling Chernobyl area
> ll
>
> Franz,
>
>   I suspect that in many ways the WW-II Allied forces firebombing of
> Dresden,
> Germany and Tokyo, Japan were perhaps just as physically damaging as the
> single
> bombs that hit Hiroshima and Nagasaki..  Thankfully as events worked out,
> the
> Truman administration and their General staff made the decision to spare
> historic Kyoto from the nuclear bomb.  There can be no doubt that the tol=
l
> of
> war is horrid!
>
>
> Roy Herren
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________**__
> From: Franz Sch=C3=B6nhofer <franz.schoenhofer at chello.at>
> To: The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) MailingList
> <radsafe at health.phys.iit.edu>
> Sent: Sun, May 19, 2013 5:43:17 AM
> Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] Re-settling Chernobyl area
>
> Joel,
> Both Hiroshima and Nagasaki are cities full with people, shops, cars etc.
> like
> any other (Japanese) city. If it were not for the memorials and some ruin=
s
> left
> standing deliberately one would not be able to recognize that these towns
> were
> destroyed by nuclear bombs. (I have  been twice in Hiroshima and once in
> Nagasaki.)
>
> As for rebuilding I can recommend facts from Google: For Hiroshima a
> construction law to rebuild the town was passed in 1949, the Hiroshima
> Peace
> Memorial Museum opened in 1955. (It is worth visiting.) The number of
> inhabitants was 419,182 in 1942, after the bombing it was 137,197 and in
> 1955 it
> had returned to "pre-war level". The town and its vicinity is a center fo=
r
> various big industries, one being "Mazda", where my car comes from.
>
> There was less information on Nagasaki, but todays population is 440,000.
> It was
> stated that the radiation dose is not distinguishable from ambient doses
> elsewhere.
>
> Let me finally remark that both towns are of considerable historic
> interest. The
> harbor of Nagasaki was for a very long time the only one open for trade
> with
> foreign countries.
>
> This is not much information, but confirms very well that all that rubbis=
h
> anti-nuclear groups tell people about land not being usable after a nucle=
ar
> accident for centuries is just what it is: BS.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Franz
>
> --- --Urspr=C3=BCnglicheNachricht----- From: Joel C.
> Sent: Friday, May 10, 2013 5:16 PM
> To: radsafe at health.phys.iit.edu
> Subject: [ RadSafe ] Re-settling Chernobyl area
>
> 27 years after the accident, Ukraine is making plans to re-settle the are=
a.
> link:
> http://www.world-nuclear-news.**org/RS_Most_Chernobyl_towns_**
> fit_for_habitation_2504121.**html<http://www.world-nuclear-news.org/RS_Mo=
st_Chernobyl_towns_fit_for_habitation_2504121.html>
>
>
> Can anyone tell me how long after the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki
> were
> those cities re-settled?
>
>
>
>
> Joel Cehn
> joelc at alum.wpi.edu
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
>
> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood t=
he
> RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
> http://health.phys.iit.edu/**radsaferules.html<http://health.phys.iit.edu=
/radsaferules.html>
>
> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
> visit:
> http://health.phys.iit.edu
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
>
> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood t=
he
> RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
> http://health.phys.iit.edu/**radsaferules.html<http://health.phys.iit.edu=
/radsaferules.html>
>
> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
> visit:
> http://health.phys.iit.edu
> ______________________________**_________________
> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
>
> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood
> the RadSafe rules. These can be found at: http://health.phys.iit.edu/**
> radsaferules.html <http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html>
>
> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
> visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu
> ______________________________**_________________
> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
>
> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood
> the RadSafe rules. These can be found at: http://health.phys.iit.edu/**
> radsaferules.html <http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html>
>
> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
> visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu
>