[ RadSafe ] Biogeochemistry
Dan McCarn
hotgreenchile at gmail.com
Fri Feb 17 00:52:38 CST 2012
Dear Joe:
Thank you for asking.
My dissertation is all that separates me from a doctorate at this point. I
finished all of my course work (4.0 GPA) and tried to push through in 2004
to complete the work, but life's challenges (a very ill wife and 2
adolescent kids to raise) slowed the progress. I studied / worked at the
Leoben Mining University in Austria 4 years as staff / researcher with the
title "Guest Scientist". The kids are now out of the house (1 married and
the other at university) and I'm now able to pursue the issue to
conclusion. Other "interruptions" have been working for mining & oil
companies that consumed my energy, paid the bills but restricted my efforts
to complete the work. Moving several times back and forth over the
Atlantic didn't help much either.
Leoben asked me to complete a dissertation in the form of a "*Habilitation*"
that would incorporate significant amounts of my prior published material
into a unified synthesis. This is more normally done as a Dozent (post-doc)
degree. Since I had already published a significant amount of work, the
thought was that it would be more straightforward to proceed with this
style of work. However, me, being the stubborn person that I am, simply
wanted to get more data to validate the concepts. Studying at a foreign
university with a project in Colorado makes 'funding' a difficult issue.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Habilitation
I can afford the gamma survey on my own; analytical costs for soil / water
sampling is the difficult issue.
Dan ii
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 11:04 PM, <JPreisig at aol.com> wrote:
> Dan,
>
> I know you are beyond the point where you need to do something like
> this, but maybe you could do
> this part time or for 1-2 semesters full time??? I think biogeochemistry
> is a fairly hot topic in the
> geosciences right now. You have an MS/MA already, right???
>
> Go to grad school for that PhD in Geosciences. You could pick a good
> school and PhD
> advisor, take 18 course credits and spend the rest of your time (30
> research credits???) finishing
> the research. You and your advisor could apply for research grants
> together, and it all might
> be too easy. You're a pretty smart guy and already well versed in the
> field of study...
>
> Up to you what you do....
>
> Regards, Joseph R. (Joe) Preisig
>
>
>
>
>
> In a message dated 2/17/2012 12:01:38 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,
> hotgreenchile at gmail.com writes:
>
> Dear Jerry:
>
> There are 1/2 billion dollars worth of crops produced in the area - you do
> the math. Given that the Central Valley in California has a similar
> hydrogeological / geochemical setting with localized
> uranium features associated with redox traps, then that's another target
> for a similar investigation. The San Luis Valley produces a large
> quantity
> of potatoes - so it could become, pardon the pun, a 'hot potato' issue.
> The farmers of the area happen to be pretty handy with firearms, and this
> could impact their livelihood (taking their view), so their trigger
> fingers
> could get 'itchy'. They might be a might bit nervous about anyone doing a
> study. I have done litigation investigations in some corners of the USA
> where I was escorted by armed officers during the entire duration of the
> study.
>
> Yes, I think that the results could be highly unpopular, but the realities
> are that there is likely to be minimal risk. The worst case scenario that
> I
> can imagine would be a number of sections of land would be removed from
> active production. For me it is odd to think that whereas mining is
> highly
> regulated and the 'incidental' production and farming use of contaminated
> waters would be a serious offence, the farming community
> is virtually insulated legally from identical consequences.
>
> I tried to get funding support a number of years ago - around 2004, but
> could find no one really interested. If you, or others in the RadSafe
> community know of a source of funding, please tell me and I could increase
> my pay from -zero- on this project to something I could live on. The
> analytical budget for the soil / water samples are not insignificant.
>
> Dan ii
>
> Dan W McCarn, Geologist
> 108 Sherwood Blvd
> Los Alamos, NM 87544-3425
> +1-505-672-2014 (Home – New Mexico)
> +1-505-670-8123 (Mobile - New Mexico)
> HotGreenChile at gmail.com (Private email) HotGreenChile at gmail dot com
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Jerry Cohen <jjc105 at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > Dan,
> > It seems to me that the study you are considering on the transport of
> > hazardous minerals could gain some very valuable information. So why
> > aren't you
> > getting funding support? Hay isn't very expensive. Do the bureaucrats
> fear
> > the
> > you mightobtain some politically unpopular information?? Good Luck,
> > Jerry
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> > From: Dan McCarn <hotgreenchile at gmail.com>
> > To: Jerry Cohen <jjcohen at prodigy.net>; The International Radiation
> > Protection
> > (Health Physics) Mailing List <radsafe at health.phys.iit.edu>; Malcolm
> > Siegel
> > <msiegel51 at yahoo.com>; Malcolm D Siegel <mdsiegel at unm.edu>
> > Sent: Thu, February 16, 2012 1:51:15 PM
> > Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] Biogeochemistry
> >
> > Dear Jerry:
> >
> > I worked on the peer review of the YM Site Characterization Report years
> > ago. I was disappointed that there was not more information
> > on comparative 'natural' risk including that of pre-existing uranium
> > features or areas in the flow path of the YM computer models that did
> not
> > address published high favorability for surficial uranium deposits
> > (non-pedogenic calcrete type). In fact, there was no mention of these
> > features in the Site Characterization report nor geochemical traps that
> > would interact with the solute flow in the far-field.
> >
> > There are potential models of concentration / anthropogene
> remobilization
> > (e.g. via high volume irrigation) that were not considered.
> >
> > I published on one such model (indirectly) looking at induced
> anthropogene
> > remobilization of uranium / radium via high-volume wells in proximity to
> > from regional redox-controlled roll-fronts in the Alamosa Basin. This
> paper
> > can be found in an IAEA proceedings:
> >
> > McCarn, Dan W. (2004): Scoping Calculations: Natural and anthropogenic
> > multi-pathway risks associated with naturally occurring uranium
> > mineralization in aquifers;
> > *IAEA-TECDOC-1396<
> > http://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/te_1396_web.pdf>
> > *, pp.289-315.
> >
> > http://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/te_1396_web.pdf
> >
> > I am currently preparing to obtain additional data from the project area
> to
> > support the project and additional risk calculations. I will be doing a
> > gamma survey (250-500 line kilometres) across the surface expression of
> the
> > regional redox front to determine the amount of radium deposited
> > in agricultural soils. The survey will inform a soil / water sampling
> > program and perhaps samples of crops. Since the area has been actively
> > irrigated for over 100 years from groundwater, I feel there is a strong
> > likelihood of significant build-up of radium and perhaps other redox
> > sensitive elements (Se, As ,Mo etc.) Whereas radium is not 'redox
> > sensitive', it is incorporated in both uraninite (UO2) and coffinite
> > (U(SiO4
> > )0.9(OH)0.4), the most likely uranium minerals present. Uranium itself
> > will likely not concentrate in the soil zone because of the highly
> > oxidizing conditions of desert soils. I have data from an analogy of the
> > San Luis Valley in Kazakhstan, where I have detailed trenching data in
> > similar soils. The uranium tends to be easily mobilized vertically
> whereas
> > the radium and progeny tends to remain in the upper soil zone.
> >
> > Since this work is being funded from my own back pocket, it will
> probably
> > go a bit slower than a commercial operation! But I'm starting to test my
> > data collection systems and will be employing my horse for the gamma
> > survey. He only charges me hay & oats!
> >
> > Dan ii
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 1:45 PM, Jerry Cohen <jjc105 at yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Dear Dan,
> > > Several years ago, I proposed a study for the DOE comparing the
> potential
> > > risk resulting from the existence, in the state of Nevada, of areas
> with
> > > heavy concentrations of naturally occuring Arsenic as compared with
> the
> > > potential health effects from the Yucca mountain Waste Repository. I
> was
> > > informed that such information would be irrelavent. Apparenty, the
> > > rejection of YM had nothing to do with it's potential risk. Given this
> > > situation, I wonder why the government pursued the project, spending
> > > enormous budgets on health effects studies, despite the sure knowledge
> > that
> > > the project would fail--and the idea that naturally occurring mineral
> > > formations in the state were more dangerous than a nuclear waste
> > repository
> > > was more than the DOE could handle.
> > > Jerry Cohen
> > >
> > > ------------------------------
> > > *From:* Dan McCarn <hotgreenchile at gmail.com>
> > > *To:* Jerry Cohen <jjcohen at prodigy.net>; The International Radiation
> > > Protection (Health Physics) Mailing List <
> radsafe at health.phys.iit.edu>
> > > *Sent:* Thu, February 16, 2012 12:22:09 PM
> > > *Subject:* Re: [ RadSafe ] Biogeochemistry
> > >
> > > Dear Jerry:
> > >
> > > It was part of the "Greening of the USGS" which occurred during the
> > > Clinton administration. Basically, all geologists who were resource
> > > analysts, minerals geologists and their ilk were forced-out of the
> USGS
> > to
> > > make way for others.
> > >
> > > I am familiar with their work in the 80s, but they all disappeared.
> > >
> > > Dan ii
> > >
> > > On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Jerry Cohen <jjc105 at yahoo.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Dan,
> > >> Several years ago, as I recall, the USGS, had a group, I believe in
> > >> Denver, who
> > >> studied the health effects of naturally occuring toxic materials
> > (arsenic,
> > >> mercury, radium, etc.) They did some interesting work and published a
> > >> monograph
> > >> on the subject. Somehow this area of study fell out favor and the
> group
> > no
> > >> longer exists. Are you familiar with this work, and do you know what
> > >> happened?
> > >> Jerry Cohen
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> ________________________________
> > >> From: Dan McCarn <hotgreenchile at gmail.com>
> > >> To: The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics)
> MailingList
> > >> <radsafe at health.phys.iit.edu>
> > >> Sent: Thu, February 16, 2012 3:35:13 AM
> > >> Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] Theme session on Geohealth at the 2012 Rocky
> > >> Mountain
> > >> Section GSA meeting.
> > >>
> > >> Dear Malcolm:
> > >>
> > >> I will be submitting an abstract - I'll have it to you tomorrow.
> > >>
> > >> Dan ii
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 9:27 PM, Dan W McCarn <
> hotgreenchile at gmail.com
> > >> >wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > ** ** ** ** **
> > >> >
> > >> > Dear RADSAFE colleagues:****
> > >> >
> > >> > ** **
> > >> >
> > >> > Malcolm Siegel of the **School** of **Medicine**, ****University**
> of
> > >> **New
> > >> > Mexico**** has asked me to forward the following meeting
> announcement
> > to
> > >> > RADSAFE: GSA is the Geological Society of America.****
> > >> >
> > >> > ** **
> > >> >
> > >> > Please respond to Malcolm directly at mdsiegel at unm.edu ****
> > >> >
> > >> > ** **
> > >> >
> > >> > Dan ii -- Dan W McCarn, Geologist ****
> > >> > ------------------------------
> > >> >
> > >> > ** **
> > >> >
> > >> > Dear Colleagues:****
> > >> >
> > >> > ** **
> > >> >
> > >> > Please consider submitting an abstract to the following Theme
> Session
> > on
> > >> > Geohealth at the 2012 Rocky Mountain Section GSA meeting.****
> > >> >
> > >> > ** **
> > >> >
> > >> > T-5. Arsenic, Uranium and Radionuclides: Geology and Health Impacts
> in
> > >> > the Southwest and Rocky Mountains Convener: Malcolm Siegel, School
> of
> > >> > Medicine, ****University** of **New Mexico********
> > >> >
> > >> > ** **
> > >> >
> > >> > Concentrations of carcinogenic arsenic and radium and nephrotoxic
> > >> uranium
> > >> > are naturally high in rocks and waters in many parts of the Navajo
> > >> Nation
> > >> > and in the Southwest and **Rocky Mountain States**. Development of
> > >> > mineral resources and urbanization has led to significant pollution
> in
> > >> > several areas. Populations may be exposed to these substances via
> > >> > inhalation, ingestion and dermal routes. Evaluation of health
> effects
> > >> due
> > >> > to past and potential future exposures has political, social and
> > >> economic
> > >> > implications and requires collaboration among earth scientists,
> civil
> > >> > engineers and health professionals. This session will bring
> together
> > >> > researchers from academic, government and private agencies to
> examine
> > >> > various dimensions of topics such as past and proposed uranium
> mining
> > >> and
> > >> > the impact of new drinking water regulations for arsenic and
> > >> radionuclides
> > >> > on communities in this area. The meeting will be held May 9-12 in
> > ****
> > >> > Albuquerque**, **NM****. The link to the meeting is:****
> > >> >
> > >> > ** **
> > >> >
> > >> > http://www.geosociety.org/Sections/rm/2012mtg/****
> > >> >
> > >> > ** **
> > >> >
> > >> > Abstracts can be submitted until Feb 14, 2012 at: ****
> > >> >
> > >> > http://www.geosociety.org/Sections/rm/2012mtg/techProg.htm****
> > >> >
> > >> > ** **
> > >> >
> > >> > Please note that I have moved from Sandia National Labs to the
> > >> ****School*
> > >> > * of **Medicine**** at UNM; my new contact information is below.
> > Thank
> > >> > you and Happy New Year. ****
> > >> >
> > >> > ** **
> > >> >
> > >> > Malcolm ****
> > >> >
> > >> > ** **
> > >> >
> > >> > Malcolm Siegel, Ph.D., M.P.H. ****
> > >> >
> > >> > Environmental Geochemistry and Epidemiology ****
> > >> >
> > >> > Department of Internal Medicine Division of Epidemiology and
> > >> Biostatistics
> > >> > ****
> > >> >
> > >> > ****University** of **New Mexico**** mdsiegel at unm.edu
> > >> msiegel51 at yahoo.com
> > >> > 505-688-3716****
> > >> >
> > >> > ** **
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Dan ii
> > >>
> > >> Dan W McCarn, Geologist
> > >> 108 Sherwood Blvd
> > >> Los Alamos, NM 87544-3425
> > >> +1-505-672-2014 (Home – New Mexico)
> > >> +1-505-670-8123 (Mobile - New Mexico)
> > >> HotGreenChile at gmail.com (Private email) HotGreenChile at gmail dot
> com
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
> > >>
> > >> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and
> understood
> > >> the
> > >> RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
> > >> http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
> > >>
> > >> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
> > >> visit:
> > >> http://health.phys.iit.edu
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
> > >>
> > >> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and
> understood
> > >> the RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
> > >> http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
> > >>
> > >> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other
> settings
> > >> visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
> >
> > Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood
> the
> > RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
> > http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
> >
> > For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
> > visit:
> > http://health.phys.iit.edu
> > _______________________________________________
> > You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
> >
> > Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood
> > the RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
> > http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
> >
> > For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
> > visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu
> >
> _______________________________________________
> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
>
> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood
> the RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
> http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
>
> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
> visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu
> _______________________________________________
> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
>
> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood
> the RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
> http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
>
> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
> visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu
>
More information about the RadSafe
mailing list