[ RadSafe ] True of False

William Lipton doctorbill34 at gmail.com
Fri Feb 17 14:42:35 CST 2012


The new reactors are inherently safe against analyzed risks.  My concern is
those risks that may have been overlooked or dismissed out of hand.  The
current plants have a history of poor performance against unanticipated
events, e.g. small break LOCA (TMI), boric acid corrosion (Davis Bessie),
and simultaneous earthquake and tsunami (Fukushima).  I'm not convinced
that the new reactor designs have anticipated all credible scenarios.
Bill Lipton
It's not about dose, it's about trust.
 On Feb 17, 2012 1:36 PM, "Ahmad Al-Ani" <ahmadalanimail at yahoo.com> wrote:

> This an interesting topic, and I encourage all to share their thoughts.
>
> Safe is not an absolute parameter, it can only be understood by comparing
> to something else. Are cars inherently safe? absolutely not, yet millions
> drive or ride them daily without any concern.
>
> Accordingly, being safe inherently or not is irrelevant to the public, and
> the media. This is another attempt, a failed one in my opinion, to impress
> the media and the public by using highly vague technical terms.
>
> Ahmad
>
>
> >________________________________
> > From: Otto G. Raabe <ograabe at ucdavis.edu>
> >To: The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) Mailing List <
> radsafe at agni.phys.iit.edu>
> >Sent: Friday, February 17, 2012 8:16 PM
> >Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] True of False
> >
> >At 09:00 AM 2/17/2012,  John wrote:
> >> Are "New" ones safer than old ones?
> >********************
> >The public's view is that Nuclear Reactor are inherently all dangerously
> unsafe.
> >
> >They have Chernobyl, Three-Mile Island, and Fukushima to prove it.
> >
> >
> >**********************************************
> >Prof. Otto G. Raabe, Ph.D., CHP
> >Center for Health & the Environment
> >University of California
> >One Shields Avenue
> >Davis, CA 95616
> >E-Mail: ograabe at ucdavis.edu
> >Phone: (530) 752-7754   FAX: (530) 758-6140
> >***********************************************
> _______________________________________________
> >You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
> >
> >Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood
> the RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
> http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
> >
> >For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
> visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu
> >
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
>
> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood
> the RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
> http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
>
> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
> visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu
>


More information about the RadSafe mailing list