[ RadSafe ] help us realise this video to fight radiophobia

Howard Long howard.long at comcast.net
Wed Mar 7 10:06:37 CST 2012


Jim,
Recheck your selection of data on bomb-related cancer.
Breast cancer in women reciving 1-50 rad was significantly LESS
than "expected".
Howard Long MD MPH

howard.long at comcast.net

On Mar 7, 2012, at 6:54 AM, "Theo Richel" <theo at richel.org> wrote:

> If you check http://www.groenerekenkamer.nl/node/1675 you find a page to
> raise funds for a video that is intended to fight radiophobia. It is not
> a commercial undertaking and I hope you will support it.
> 
> Many thanks in advance,
> 
> Theo Richel
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu
> [mailto:radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu] On Behalf Of Jim Conca
> Sent: woensdag 7 maart 2012 15:12
> To: radsafe at health.phys.iit.edu
> Subject: [ RadSafe ] Fallout
> 
> Dear members,
> 
> I am in need of clarification. Everything I've seen from the effects of
> the Hiroshima and Nagasaki detonations suggest that the initial burst of
> rad during the blast in the 3-km annulus around, but outside of, the
> blast zone caused the radiation-related cancers and deaths in the
> surviving cohort, and when I plot cancers, it is indeed linear with dose
> down to about 10 rem where it merges with background (Figure attached),
> but that fallout did nothing measurable. Is this correct? Is it because
> doses from fallout were so low?
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> Jim
> 
> Dr. James Conca, Director
> Center for Laboratory Science
> RJ LeeGroup, Inc.
> 2710 N. 20th Ave
> Pasco, WA 99301
> 509-545-4989 office
> 509-205-7541 cell
> jconca at rjlg.com
> 
> The information contained in this e-mail message, together with any
> attachments thereto, is intended only for the personal and confidential
> use of the addressee[s] named above. The message and the attachments are
> or may be an attorney-client or other privileged or protected
> communication. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, or
> authorized to receive it for the intended recipient, you have received
> this message in error. You are not to review, use, disseminate,
> distribute or copy this message, any attachments thereto, or their
> contents. If you have received this message in error, please immediately
> notify us by return e-mail message, and delete the original message.
> Thank you for your cooperation.
> _______________________________________________
> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
> 
> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at: http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
> 
> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu


More information about the RadSafe mailing list