[ RadSafe ] Reprocessing
JPreisig at aol.com
JPreisig at aol.com
Mon May 28 23:11:11 CDT 2012
Dear Radsafe:
This is from: _jpreisig at aol.com_ (mailto:jpreisig at aol.com) .
Hello again.
Reprocessing HLW (High Level Waste) is a technical as well as
a political decision.
With the $$$ available in the Yucca Mountain and/or Nuclear Savings
Funds, one might be
able to set up one test reprocessing facility in the USA. Other
regional reprocessing
facilities could be built eventually. Guess these centers could be
built in areas/states which
would welcome them.
One argument against reprocessing is nuclear proliferation.
The products of reprocessing
are fission fragments, U235, U238, Pu, Long lived radionuclides and
so on. See the Fission/
Reactor Book by Nero and Nuclear Physics books by Kaplan, Segre etc.
I guess French and/or US companies could be sought to run such
a facility.
Pu from reprocessing could be sent directly to the US
government. Or perhaps it could
be mixed with U238 (at a 5% Pu enrichment level) and used in an
eventual Pu reactor.
Would this fuel mixing scenario be viable??? --- the question is
directed at nuclear engineers
and/or Health Physicists working at US and/or other reactors.
U238 could be used in reactor fuel for re-use.
Fission fragments (Sr-90, Cs-137, etc.) could be sent to Yucca
Mountain (perhaps WIPP??)
for 300 year decay (10 half-lives). Long-lived radionuclides could
be put in Yucca mountain,
or perhaps somewhere else.
Reprocessing separates off the various fuel components,
allowing the volume for long-lived
storage (disposal???) to be less than the original spent fuel
volume.
The USA doesn't have to reprocess HLW, but maybe it should
develop expertise in this
area. What actually will happen --- your guess is as good as
mine. After 50+ years,
we're still waiting on Fusion to come through. Ho Hum.
Be Good... Regards, Joseph R. (Joe) Preisig, PhD
More information about the RadSafe
mailing list