[ RadSafe ] Supposed Courage of Margaret Chan WHO DirectorGeneral, on ionising radiation

[Stewart Farber]

Once again, the genius of Mark Twain over 100 years ago may have stated it 
best:

"The difference between a lie and cat  is that a cat only has 9 lives"

Twain would be rolling over in his grave, or shaking his head in disbelief 
if he saw how lies and distortions,  without any basis, can rocket around 
the globe via the web. These unsupported and impossible claims disproved by 
the trivial impact observed from  background & medical radiation are 
repeated by liars and career scaremongers in a chain reaction of nescience 
resulting in an explosion of societal damage.

Stewart Farber


-----Original Message----
From: edmond0033 at comcast.net
Sent: Saturday, September 29, 2012 4:27 PM
To: RADSAFE
Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] Supposed Courage of Margaret Chan WHO 
DirectorGeneral, on ionising radiation

If no level of radiation is safe, how come the human race have survived this
many millenniums??  Does she have an answer and what proof does she have?
Who is she trying to scare and what does she suppose we should do about it!


Ed Baratta

edmond0033 at comcast.net

-----Original Message----- 
From: Roger Helbig
Sent: Saturday, September 29, 2012 7:15 AM
To: RADSAFE
Subject: [ RadSafe ] Supposed Courage of Margaret Chan WHO Director
General,on ionising radiation

Christina MacPherson posted: "HISTORY WAS MADE. Marion Odell, 29 Sept 2012
On May 12, 2011 history was quietly made when courageous WHO
Director-General Margaret Chan said “There is no safe low level of
radiation." Until May 12, 2011, the World Health Organization (WHO) always"

Courage of Margaret Chan WHO Director General, on ionising radiation

by Christina MacPherson

HISTORY WAS MADE. Marion Odell, 29 Sept 2012 On May 12, 2011 history was
quietly made when courageous WHO Director-General Margaret Chan said “There
is no safe low level of radiation."

Until May 12, 2011, the World Health Organization (WHO) always followed the
lead of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) on nuclear health
effects issues as there is a 1959 agreement that WHO would accept the
findings of that organization. This agreement is still in effect and
hopefully will be rescinded soon.

However this most likely will need some considerable political pressure from
the
public. It is imperative that we support this tremendously important
pronouncement and spread the message far and wide. This is a breakthrough
that will impress the public because of the prestige of the World Health
Organization and the integrity of the
Director-General Dr. Margaret Chan.

The letter to Director-General Dr. Margaret Chan from the International
Institute of Concern for Public appears below. It can also be seen at
iicph.org/330.

URL: http://wp.me/phgse-7PN

http://nuclear-news.net/2012/09/29/courage-of-margaret-chan-who-director-general-on-ionising-radiation/
_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list

Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the
RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html

For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit:
http://health.phys.iit.edu

_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list

Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the 
RadSafe rules. These can be found at: 
http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html

For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit: 
http://health.phys.iit.edu